Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification.

Abstract

The influence of semantic ambiguity on word identification processes was explored in a series of word naming and lexical-decision experiments. There was no reliable ambiguity effect in 2 naming experiments, although an ambiguity advantage in lexical decision was obtained when orthographi-cally legal nonwords were used. No ambiguity effect was found in iexical decision when orthographically illegal nonwords were used, implying a semantic locus for the ambiguity advantage. These results were simulated by using a distributed memory model that also produces the ambiguity disadvantage in gaze duration that has been obtained with a reading comprehension task. Ambiguity effects in the model arise from the model's attempt to activate multiple meanings of an ambiguous word in response to presentation of that word's orthographic pattern. Reasons for discrepancies in empirical results and implications for distributed memory models are considered. Any comprehensive theory of mental representation and process must accommodate the complex means by which concepts are communicated through language. Through the course of history, humans have developed tools of communica-tion that facilitate the relaying of ideas and concepts, such as a writing system or orthography. This mapping of concepts to orthography is not entirely one to one, however, resulting in some words that correspond to multiple concepts, which are known as semantically ambiguous words. When reading text, the context provided by preceding words and sentences pro-vides a means of disambiguating such words. As a result, we may not even notice the ambiguity in words that we are reading in context. If, on the other hand, semantically ambiguous words are presented in isolation, their alternative meanings are readily accessible, and thus their ambiguous nature is noticed. In the research reported in this article, we compare performance on semantically ambiguous words with that of semantically unambiguous words in isolated word identifica-tion tasks and describe simulations of the empirical effects within the framework of a distributed memory architecture

Cites (7)

1. The Organization of Behavior
   Hebb, D.O. · 2005
2. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
   Just, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A. · 1992 · Psychological Review
3. Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia.
   Hinton, Geoffrey E., Shallice, Tim · 1991 · Psychological Review
4. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?
   Andrews, Sally · 1989 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
5. Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?
   Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., Haggard, P. N. · 1989 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
6. The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?
   Balota, David A, Chumbley, James I · 1985 · Journal of Memory and Language
7. The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures
   Shulman, Harvey G., Hornak, Rosemary, Sanders, Elizabeth · 1978 · Memory & Cognition

Show all 7 references

Cited by (3)

1. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
   Botvinick, Matthew M., Braver, Todd S., Barch, Deanna M., Carter, Cameron S., Cohen, Jonathan D. · 2001 · Psychological Review
2. Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words
   Hoffman, Paul, Lambon Ralph, Matthew A., Rogers, Timothy T. · 2013 · Behavior Research Methods
3. Word or word-like? Dissociating orthographic typicality from lexicality in the left occipito-temporal cortex
   Woollams, Anna M., Silani, Giorgia, Okada, Kayoko, Patterson, Karalyn, Price, Cathy J. · 2011 · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

See all 241