Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure.

Jacoby, Larry L.·1998·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Three experiments investigated assumptions of the process-dissociation procedure for separating consciously controlled and automatic influences of memory. Conditions that encouraged direct retrieval revealed process dissociations. Manipulating attention during study or manipulating study time affected recollection but left automatic influences of memory relatively invariant. However, paradoxical dissociations were found when conditions encouraged use of a generate-recognize strategy, violating assumptions underlying the estimation procedure. Use of subjective reports to gain estimates produced parallel results. Easily observed correlations are shown to be not useful for testing assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure. A multinomial model produced results that agree with those from the process-dissociation approach.

Cites (2)

  1. GPOWER: A general power analysis program
    Erdfelder, Edgar, Faul, Franz, Buchner, Axel · 1996 · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
  2. How many memory systems are there?
    Tulving, Endel · 1985 · American Psychologist

Show all 2 references

Cited by (14)

  1. The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
    Yonelinas, Andrew P · 2002 · Journal of Memory and Language
  2. The restless mind
    Smallwood, Jonathan, Schooler, Jonathan W. · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Course of illness, hippocampal function, and hippocampal volume in major depression
    MacQueen, Glenda M., Campbell, Stephanie, McEwen, Bruce S., Macdonald, Kathryn, Amano, Shigeko, Joffe, Russell T., Nahmias, Claude, Young, L. Trevor · 2003 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  4. Mind-wandering and dysphoria
    Smallwood, Jonathan, O'Connor, Rory C., Sudbery, Megan V., Obonsawin, Marc · 2007 · Cognition & Emotion
  5. Individual differences in executive processing predict susceptibility to interference in verbal working memory.
    Hedden, Trey, Yoon, Carolyn · 2006 · Neuropsychology

See all 325

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.24.1.3
The paper
Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.24.1.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.