Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning.
Abstract
processes. However, research has focused on small, poorly differentiated categories and on task-final performances—both may highlight exemplar strategies. Thus, we evaluated participants ' categorization strategies and standard categorization models at successive stages in the learning of smaller, less differentiated categories and larger, more differentiated categories. In the former case, the exemplar model dominated even early in learning. In the latter case, the prototype model had a strong early advantage that gave way slowly. Alternative models, and even the behavior of individual parameters within models, suggest a psychological transition from prototype-based to exemplar-based processing during category learning and show that different category structures produce different trajectories of learning through the larger space of strategies. Categorizing objects into psychological equivalence classes is a basic cognitive task. Descriptions of categorization long favored a generalized prototype principle (Homa,
Cites (66)
- A Handbook of Child Psychology1932 · Nature
- Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categoriesRosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B · 1975 · Cognitive Psychology
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and MemoryLyle E. Bourne · 1977
- Context theory of classification learningMedin, Douglas L., Schaffer, Marguerite M. · 1978 · Psychological Review
- Cognition and CategorizationRosch, Eleanor, Lloyd, Barbara B. · 2024 · Routledge eBooks
- The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Gregory L. Murphy, Douglas L. Medin · 1985 · Psychological Review
- Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.Robert M. Nosofsky · 1986 · Journal of Experimental Psychology General
- Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological ScienceShepard, Roger N. · 1987 · Science
- Cognitive Development and Acquisition of Language1973 · Elsevier eBooks
- Categorization of Natural ObjectsMervis, C B, Rosch, E · 1981 · Annual Review of Psychology
Cited by (12)
- Human Category LearningAshby, F. Gregory, Maddox, W. Todd · 2005 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Doing without ConceptsMachery, Edouard · 2009 · Oxford University Press eBooks
- A rational analysis of rule-based concept learningGoodman, Noah D., Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Feldman, Jacob, Griffiths, Thomas L. · 2008 · Cognitive Science
- Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for coloursteels, luc, belpaeme, tony · 2005 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice.Reynolds, Scott J. · 2006 · Journal of Applied Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1411
- The paper
- Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.