Cited by 440Categorization, perception, and languageLanguage and cultural evolutionEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour

Open access
steels, luc, belpaeme, tony·2005·Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Abstract

this article proposes a number of models to examine through which mechanisms a population of autonomous agents could arrive at a repertoire of perceptually grounded categories that is sufficiently shared to allow successful communication. the models are inspired by the main approaches to human categorisation being discussed in the literature: nativism, empiricism, and culturalism. colour is taken as a case study. although we take no stance on which position is to be accepted as final truth with respect to human categorisation and naming, we do point to theoretical constraints that make each position more or less likely and we make clear suggestions on what the best engineering solution would be. specifically, we argue that the collective choice of a shared repertoire must integrate multiple constraints, including constraints coming from communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0140525x05000087

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Game-theoretic approaches to language evolution emphasize utility maximization.

    “One common answer to this question stems from game-theoretic approaches of language evolution that emphasize utility maximization (Chaabouni, Strub, et al., 2021;Steels & Belpaeme, 2005;Still & Precup, 2012).”

    From Towards Human-Like Emergent Communication via Utility, Informativeness, and Complexity (2025) · cites this paper as Steels & Belpaeme, 2005

    Section 2.1 (p. 13) applies evolutionary game theory to language games and says agents adapt after interactions to become more successful. Section 4.1 (p. 34) measures communicative success, but the paper does not describe its agents as maximizing utility or establish that game-theoretic approaches generally emphasize utility maximization. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. Belpaeme, T. (2001). Simulating the formation of color categories. In Nebel, B., editor, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'01) , pages 393-398, Seattle, WA. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
  2. Belpaeme, T. (2002). Factors influencing the origins of colour categories . PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
  3. Berlin, B. and Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution . University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  4. Bimler, D., Kirkland, J., and Jameson, K. (2004). Quantifying variations in personal color spaces: Are there sex differences in color perception? COLOR Research and application , 29(2):128-134.
  5. Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine . Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  6. Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  7. Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., and Weiskopf, S. (1976). Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 2:115-129.
  8. Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C., editors (2001). Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  9. Briscoe, T., editor (2002). Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: formal and computational models . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  10. Burton, G. and Moorhead, I. R. (1987). Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. Applied Optics , 26(1):157-170.
  11. Cangelosi, A. (2001). Evolution of communication and language: using signals, symbols and words. IEEE Transactions in Evolution Computation , 5:93-101.
  12. Cangelosi, A. and Parisi, D., editors (2001). Simulating the Evolution of Language . Springer Verlag, London.
  13. Davidoff, J. (2001). Language and perceptual categorisation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 5(9):382-387.
  14. Davies, I. and Franklin, A. (2002). Categorical perception may affect colour pop-out in infants after all. British Journal of Developmental Psychology , 20:185-203.
  15. Davies, I. R. (1998). A study of colour grouping in three languages: A test of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology , 98:433-452.
  16. Davies, I. R. and Corbett, G. (1997). A cross-cultural study of colour grouping: Evidence for weak linguistic relativity. British Journal of Psychology , 88:493-517.
  17. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene . Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  18. de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1999). How Language Comes to Children: From Birth to Two Years . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  19. De Valois, R., Abramov, I., and Jacobs, G. (1966). Analysis of response patterns of LGN cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America , 56(7):966-977.
  20. De Valois, R. L. and De Valois, K. K. (1975). Neural coding of color. In Carterette, E. C. and Friedman, M. P., editors, Handbook of Perception, Volume V: Seeing , pages 117-166. Academic Press, New York.
  21. Durham, W. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, Culture and Human Diversity . Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  22. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., and Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  23. Fairchild, M. (1998). Color Appearance Models . Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  24. Ferber, J. (1998). Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence . Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  25. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  26. Fogel, L. J. (1999). Intelligence Through Simulated Evolution: Forty years of evolutionary programming . Wiley Series on Intelligent Systems. John Wiley and sons, New York.
  27. Gegenfurtner, K. R. and Sharpe, L. T., editors (1999). Color Vision: From Genes to Perception . Cambridge University Press, New York.
  28. Gellatly, A. (1995). Colourful Whorfian ideas: Linguistic and cultural influences on the perception and cognition of colour, and on the investigation of them. Mind and Language , 10(3):199-225.
  29. Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S., editors (2003). Language in mind . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  30. Gerhardstein, P., Renner, P., and Rovee-Collier, C. (1999). The roles of perceptual and categorical similarity in colour pop-out in infants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology , 17:403-420.
  31. Gibbons, R. (1992). Game Theory for Applied Economists . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  32. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning . Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  33. Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity . Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  34. Hassoun, M. (1995). Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  35. Hendley, C. D. and Hecht, S. (1949). The colors of natural objects and terrains, and their relation to visual color deficiency. Journal of the Optical Society of America , 39(10):870-873.
  36. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence . University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  37. Howard, C. M. and Burnidge, J. A. (1994). Colors in natural landscapes. Journal of the Society of Information Display , 2(1):47-55.
  38. Hurford, J. R. (1989). Biological evolution of the Saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device. Lingua , 77(2):187-222.
  39. Jameson, K. and D'Andrade, R. (1997). It's not really red, green, yellow, blue: an inquiry into perceptual color space. In Hardin, C. and Maffi, L., editors, Color categories in thought and language , pages 295-319. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  40. Jameson, K. A. and Alvarado, N. (2003). The relational correspondence between category exemplars and names. Philosophical psychology , 10(1):25-49.
  41. Kay, P., Berlin, B., Maffi, L., and Merrifield, W. (1997). Color naming across languages. In Hardin, C. and Maffi, L., editors, Color Categories in Thought and Language . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  42. Kay, P., Berlin, B., and Merrifield, W. (1991). Biocultural implications of systems in color naming. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology , 1(1):12-25.
  43. Kay, P. and Maffi, L. (1999). Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons. American Anthropologist , 101(4):743-760.
  44. Kay, P. and McDaniel, C. (1978). The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms. Language , 54(3):610-646.
  45. Kay, P. and Regier, T. (2003). Resolving the question of color naming universals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 100(15):9085-9089.
  46. Komatsu, H., Ideura, Y., Kaji, S., and Yamane, S. (1992). Color selectivity of neurons in the inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience , 12(2):408-424.
  47. Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  48. Krogh, A. and Hertz, J. A. (1995). A simple weight decay can improve generalization. In Moody, J., Hanson, S., and Lippmann, R., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 4 , pages 950-957. Morgan Kauffmann, San Mateo, CA.
  49. Lammens, J. M. (1994). A computational model of color perception and color naming . PhD thesis, State University of New York.
  50. Langton, C. G., editor (1995). Artificial Life: An Overview . The MIT Press, A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA.
  51. Lantz, D. and Stefflre, V. (1964). Language and cognition revisited. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 69(5):472-481.
  52. Lenneberg, E. H. and Roberts, J. M. (1956). The language of experience: A study in methodology. International Journal of American Linguistics , memoir 13.
  53. Lucy, J. A. (1997). The linguistics of 'color'. In Hardin, C. L. and Maffi, L., editors, Color Categories in Thought and Language , pages 320-346. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  54. MacLaury, R. E. (1997). Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica . University of Texas Press, Austin.
  55. Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1998). The Tree of Knowledge (revised edition) . Shambhala Press, Boston.
  56. May, R. (1986). When two and two do not make four: nonlinear phenomena in ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B , 228:241-266.
  57. Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  58. Minsky, M. and Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  59. Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine Learning . McGraw-Hill, New York.
  60. Mollon, J. D., Pokorny, J., and Knoblauch, K. (2003). Normal and defective colour vision . Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  61. Neitz, J., Carroll, J., Yamauchi, Y., Neitz, M., and Williams, D. (2002). Color perception is mediated by a plastic neural mechanism that is adjustable in adults. Neuron , 35(4):783-792.
  62. Neitz, J., Neitz, M., and Jacobs, G. H. (1993). More than three different cone pigments among people with normal colour vision. Vision Research , 33(1):117122.
  63. Nowak, M. A. and Krakauer, D. (1999). The evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science , 96(14):8028-8033.
  64. Oliphant, M. (1996). The dilemma of Saussurean communication. BioSystems , 37(1-2):31-38.
  65. Parkkinen, J., Hallikainen, J., and Jaaskelainen, T. (1989). Characteristic spectra of Munsell colors. Journal of the Optical Society of America , 6(2):318-322.
  66. Quine, W. (1960). Word and Object . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  67. Quinlan, J. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning . Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
  68. Roberson, D., Davies, I., and Davidoff, J. (2000). Color categories are not universal: replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 129(3):369-398.
  69. Rosch-Heider, E. (1972). Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 93:10-20.
  70. Rumelhart, D. and McClelland, J. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Volume 1 and 2.
  71. Saunders, B. and van Brakel, J. (1997). Are there nontrivial constraints on colour categorization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 20(2):167-228.
  72. Sharpe, L. T., Stockman, A., J¨ agle, H., and Nathans, J. (1999). Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision, and color blindness. In Gegenfurtner, K. R. and Sharpe, L. T., editors, Color Vision: From genes to perception . Cambridge University Press, New York.
  73. Shepard, R. N. (1992). The perceptual organization of colors: An adaptation to regularities of the terrestrial world? In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., editors, Adapted Mind , pages 495-532. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  74. Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 1:2-28. Reprinted in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3).
  75. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach . Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
  76. Steels, L. (1996a). Perceptually grounded meaning creation. In Tokoro, M., editor, Proceedings of the International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS-96) , pages 338-344, Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press.
  77. Steels, L. (1996b). Self-organizing vocabularies. In Langton, C. and Shimohara, T., editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Life V (Alife V) (Nara, Japan) , Cambridge, MA. The MIT Press.
  78. Steels, L. (1997). The synthetic modeling of language origins. Evolution of Communication , 1(1):1-34.
  79. Steels, L. (2001a). Language games for autonomous robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems , sept-oct 2001:17-22.
  80. Steels, L. and Kaplan, F. (1998). Stochasticity as a source of innovation in language games. In Adami, G., Belew, R., Kitano, H., and Taylor, C., editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Life VI (Alife VI) (Los Angeles, California) , Cambridge, MA. The MIT Press.
  81. Steels, L. and Kaplan, F. (1999). Situated grounded word semantics. In Dean, T., editor, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'99) (San Francisco, CA) , San Francisco, CA. Morgan Kauffman Publishers.
  82. Steels, L. and Kaplan, F. (2002). AIBO's first words: The social learning of language and meaning. Evolution of Communication , 4(1):3-32.
  83. Steels, L., Kaplan, F., McIntyre, A., and Van Looveren, J. (2002). Crucial factors in the origins of word-meaning. In Wray, A., editor, The Transition to Language , pages 252-271. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  84. Sturges, J. and Whitfield, T. A. (1995). Locating basic colours in the munsell space. COLOR Research and Application , 20(6):364-376.
  85. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  86. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition . Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  87. Vogt, P. (2003). Anchoring of semiotic symbols. Robotics and Autonomous Systems , 43(2):109-120.
  88. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought and Reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf . The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Edited by Carrol, J.B.
  89. Worden, R. (1995). A speed limit for evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 176:137-152.
  90. Wyszecki, G. and Stiles, W. (1982). Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae . John Wiley and sons, New York, 2nd edition. Reprinted in 2000.
  91. Yendrikhovskij, S. N. (2001). Computing color categories from statistics of natural images. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology , 45(5):409-417.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
steels, L., & belpaeme, T.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
  • steels, luc
  • belpaeme, tony
Venue
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2005-08
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
469-489
ISSN
  • 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1825
OpenAlex
W2166188321
Cited by
440
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 32
FWCI
37.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
color classification, language acquisition, nativism, empiricism, culturalism, communication, autonomous agents, color naming
MeSH terms
Classification, Color, Color Perception, Communication, Computer Simulation, Culture, Games, Experimental, Humans, Language, Models, Genetic, Models, Psychological, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review