Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.
Abstract
This article investigates how people's metacognitive judgments influence subsequent study-time-allocation strategies. The authors present a comprehensive literature review indicating that people allocate more study time to judged-difficult than to judged-easy items--consistent with extant models of study-time allocation. However, typically, the materials were short, and participants had ample time for study. In contrast, in Experiment 1, when participants had insufficient time to study, they allocated more time to the judged-easy items than to the judged-difficult items, especially when expecting a test. In Experiment 2, when the materials were shorter, people allocated more study time to the judged-difficult materials. In Experiment 3, under high time pressure, people preferred studying judged-easy sonnets; under moderate time pressure, they showed no preference. These results provide new evidence against extant theories of study-time allocation.
Cites (97)
- Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiryFlavell, John H. · 1979 · American Psychologist
- Human Problem Solving.Axten, Nick, Newell, Allen, Simon, Herbert A. · 1973 · Contemporary Sociology
- Social psychology: handbook of basic principles2008 · Choice Reviews Online
- Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic MemoryCraik, Fergus I. M., Tulving, Endel · 1975 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpowerMetcalfe, Janet, Mischel, Walter · 1999 · Psychological Review
- Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New FindingsNelson, Thomas O. · 1990 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- Advances in Instructional Psychology2019 · Routledge eBooks
- Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice1998 · Routledge eBooks
- Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing1994 · The MIT Press eBooks
- Knowing when, where, and how to remember ; A problem of metacognitionAnn L. Brown · 1978 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
Cited by (36)
- Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the WorkplaceDunning, David, Heath, Chip, Suls, Jerry M. · 2004 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and IllusionsBjork, Robert A., Dunlosky, John, Kornell, Nate · 2013 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retentionDunlosky, John, Rawson, Katherine A. · 2012 · Learning and Instruction
- Metacognition and consciousnessKoriat, Asher · 2007 · The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness
- Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choiceMETCALFE, J., FINN, B. · 2008 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.204
- The paper
- Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.