The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, as Bargh, Gollwitzer, Lee-Chai, Barndollar, and Trotschel (2001) demonstrated, people often do things without knowing why—apparently without the intervention of metacognition (see also Nisbett & Wilson, 1977 ).”
BackgroundMetacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
(1998) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410602350 · Cited by 2,119
The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals.
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1014 · Cited by 1,865
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00147.x · Cited by 580
The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will
Wegner, D. M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00002-0 · Cited by 561
The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.127.1.55 · Cited by 529
Rhesus monkeys know when they remember
Hampton, R. R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.071600998 · Cited by 493
Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.
Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.204 · Cited by 466
Self-citationKoriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36 · Cited by 422
Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.1024 · Cited by 396
Cited by
Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 · Cited by 1,468
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003 · Cited by 713
The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence
Weil, L. G., Fleming, S. M., Dumontheil, I., Kilford, E. J., Weil, R. S., Rees, G., Dolan, R. J., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2013) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.004 · Cited by 429
Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper.
Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0022086 · Cited by 406
Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study
Metcalfe, J. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x · Cited by 374
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- METCALFE, J., & FINN, B.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-179
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2156525945
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/pbr.15.1.174
- The paper
- METCALFE, J., & FINN, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.1.174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
