Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.
Abstract
Causal asymmetry is one of the most fundamental features of the physical world: Causes produce effects, but not vice versa. This article is part of a debate between the view that, in principle, people are sensitive to causal directionality during learning (causal-model theory) and the view that learning primarily involves acquiring associations between cues and outcomes irrespective of their causal role (associative theories). Four experiments are presented that use asymmetries of cue competition to discriminate between these views. These experiments show that, contrary to associative accounts, cue competition interacts with causal status and that people are capable of differentiating between predictive and diagnostic inferences. Additional implications of causal-model theory are elaborated and empirically tested against alternative accounts. The results uniformly favor causal-model theory.
Cites (5)
- Adaptive switching circuitsWIDROW, B., HOFF, M. E. · 1960
- A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Pearce, John M., Hall, Geoffrey · 1980 · Psychological Review
- Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Hasher, Lynn, Zacks, Rose T. · 1979 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcementMackintosh, N. J. · 1975 · Psychological Review
- Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertaintyCosmides, L · 1996 · Cognition
Cited by (4)
- Causal Inference in Multisensory PerceptionKörding, Konrad P., Beierholm, Ulrik, Ma, Wei Ji, Quartz, Steven, Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Shams, Ladan · 2007 · PLoS ONE
- Mirror neurons: from origin to functionCook, Richard, Bird, Geoffrey, Catmur, Caroline, Press, Clare, Heyes, Cecilia · 2014 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation modelsDe Houwer, Jan · 2009 · Learning & Behavior
- Seeing Versus Doing: Two Modes of Accessing Causal Knowledge.Waldmann, Michael R., Hagmayer, York · 2005 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.53
- The paper
- Waldmann, M. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.53
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.