Test-expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition.

Balota, David A., Neely, James H.·1980·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory

Abstract

To determine if people who expect a recall (RCL) test encode a list of to-beremembered (TBR) words differently than those who expect a recognition (RON) test, people were first induced to expect a RCL or a RON test and then were asked to remember a critical list consisting of both high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) words. Following presentation of the critical list, different groups received either an expected RCL test, an unexpected RCL test, an expected RON test, or an unexpected RON test. There were two main results: (a) People who expected RCL did better in both RCL and RON than did people who expected RON, but to a much greater degree for HF than LF words, (b) The standard word-frequency effect was obtained; namely, HF words were better recalled but more poorly recognized than LF words. These data were interpreted within the framework of Anderson and Bower's generaterecognize theory as indicating that, compared to people expecting a RON test, people expecting a RCL test more variably encode the semantic interpretations of the TBR word. The implications that these data have for Glanzer and Bowies' theory of the word-frequency effect and for classroom examinations were also discussed.

Cites (1)

  1. Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.
    Anderson, John R., Bower, Gordon H. · 1972 · Psychological Review

Show all 1 references

Cited by (6)

  1. Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.
    Roediger, Henry L. · 1990 · American Psychologist
  2. Précis of Elements of episodic memory
    Tulving, Endel · 1984 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  3. Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.
    Bowers, Jeffrey S., Davis, Colin J. · 2012 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. The mirror effect in recognition memory
    Glanzer, Murray, Adams, John K. · 1985 · Memory & Cognition
  5. Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review.
    Chan, Jason C. K., Meissner, Christian A., Davis, Sara D. · 2018 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 200

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test-expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.6.5.576
The paper
Balota, D. A., & Neely, J. H. (1980). Test-expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.6.5.576

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.