Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review.
Abstract
A growing body of research has shown that retrieval can enhance future learning of new materials. In the present report, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on this finding, which we term test-potentiated new learning. Our primary objectives were to (a) produce an integrative review of the existing theoretical explanations, (b) summarize the extant empirical data with a meta-analysis, (c) evaluate the existing accounts with the meta-analytic results, and (d) highlight areas that deserve further investigations. Here, we identified four nonexclusive classes of theoretical accounts, including resource accounts, metacognitive accounts, context accounts, and integration accounts. Our quantitative review of the literature showed that testing reliably potentiates the future learning of new materials by increasing correct recall or by reducing erroneous intrusions, and several factors have a powerful impact on whether testing potentiates or impairs new learning. Results of a metaregression analysis provide considerable support for the integration account. Lastly, we discuss areas of under-investigation and possible directions for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retrieval practice also enhances learning of new information (the forward testing effect or test-potentiated new learning).
“as well as the learning of new information, an effect known as the forward testing effect (FTE) or test-potentiated new learning (TPNL; Chan, Meissner, Davis, 2018).”
From A grain of truth in the grain size effect: Retrieval practice is more effective when interspersed during learning. (2024) · cites this paper as Chan, Meissner, Davis, 2018
The FTE is typically studied by comparing an interim test group with a non-retrieval activity group, and the key outcome is enhanced final test recall of the last chunk in the interim test group.
“The FTE is typically studied in experiments which compare an interim test group (equivalent to the small grain size group in Figure 1) with an otherwise identical group that engages in some other non-retrieval activity (often restudy) in place of the interim tests. The key outcome - the FTE - refers to the finding that final test recall of the last chunk of material is enhanced in the interim test”
From A grain of truth in the grain size effect: Retrieval practice is more effective when interspersed during learning. (2024) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2018
One potential causal factor of the grain size effect is that interim tests potentiate new learning.
“As discussed, one potential causal factor of the grain size effect is that interim tests potentiate new learning (Chan et al., 2018).”
From A grain of truth in the grain size effect: Retrieval practice is more effective when interspersed during learning. (2024) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2018
The forward testing effect increases with number of interim tests.
“The change from 3 to 4 lists was aimed at increasing the magnitude of any forward testing effect, which increases with number of interim tests (Chan et al., 2018).”
From A grain of truth in the grain size effect: Retrieval practice is more effective when interspersed during learning. (2024) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2018
A recent meta-analysis found a medium-large forward testing effect (Hedges' g = 0.61) in studies using a standard procedure and a restudy control.
“This effect size was chosen as a recent meta-analysis found a medium-large forward testing effect (Hedges' g = 0.61; Chan et al., 2018) in studies using a standard procedure and a restudy control.”
From A grain of truth in the grain size effect: Retrieval practice is more effective when interspersed during learning. (2024) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2018
When later study opportunities are provided, prior tests can enable a learner to benefit more from future re-encoding (test-potentiated learning) or even to learn more novel information (test-potentiated new learning).
“when later study opportunities are provided, prior tests can enable a learner to benefit more from the future re-encoding opportunity (an effect known as test-potentiated learning; see, e.g., Arnold & McDermott 2013a,b) or even to learn more novel information (i.e., test-potentiated new learning; see Chan et al. 2018, Pastötter & Bäuml 2014, Szpunar et al. 2008).”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Chan et al. 2018
Cites
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540 · see citing works
Data collection in a flat world: the strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1753 · Cited by 2,242 · see citing works
Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression.
Michie, S., Abraham, C., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., & Gupta, S. (2009) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016136 · Cited by 2,229 · see citing works
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland, C. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037559 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Registered Replication Report: Schooler and Engstler-Schooler (1990)
Alogna, V. K., Attaya, M. K., Aucoin, P., Bahník, Š., Birch, S., Birt, A. R., Bornstein, B. H., Bouwmeester, S., Brandimonte, M. A., Brown, C., et al. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614545653 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationThe testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes
Zaromb, F. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.8.995 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The benefit of generating errors during learning
Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033194 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Effects of prior free recall testing on final recall and recognition.
Darley, C. F., & Murdock, B. B. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031836 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory
St. Jacques, P. L., Olm, C., & Schacter, D. L. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319630110 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning
McDermott, K. B. (2021) · Annual review of psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051019 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Pan, S. C., & Carpenter, S. K. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09814-5 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Yu, Y., Zhao, W., Li, A., Shanks, D. R., Hu, X., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10024-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Don, H. J., Boustani, S., Yang, C., & Shanks, D. R. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001382
- Authors
- Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A., & Davis, S. D.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1111-1146
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2894172524
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-10-08)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- retrieval practice, retrieval, metacognition, context effects, resource allocation, memory retrieval, intrusive memories
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Learning, Psychological Theory, Mental Recall, Regression Analysis, Test Taking Skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review