On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures.

Abstract

Theory development typically focuses on relationships among theoretical constructs, placing little emphasis on relationships between constructs and measures. In most cases, constructs are treated as causes of their measures. However, this causal flow is sometimes reversed, such that measures are viewed as causes of constructs. Procedures have been developed to identify and estimate models that specify constructs as causes or effects of measures. However, these procedures provide little guidance for determining a priori whether constructs should be specified as causes or effects of their measures. Moreover, these procedures address few of the possible causal structures by which constructs and measures may be related. This article develops principles for specifying the direction and structure of relationships between constructs and measures. These principles are illustrated using examples from psychological, sociological, and organizational research.

Cites (6)

1. Construct validity in psychological tests.
   Cronbach, Lee J., Meehl, Paul E. · 1955 · Psychological Bulletin
2. An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
   Doney, Patricia M., Cannon, Joseph P. · 1997 · Journal of Marketing
3. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
   Bollen, Kenneth, Lennox, Richard · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Measurement of job and work involvement
   Kanungo, Rabindra N. · 1982 · Journal of Applied Psychology
5. Problems of recall and misclassification with checklist methods of measuring stressful life events.
   Raphael, Karen G., Cloitre, Marylene, Dohrenwend, Bruce P. · 1991 · Health Psychology
6. Effect Analysis in Structural-Equation Models II: Calculation of Specific Indirect Effects
   FOX, JOHN · 1985 · Sociological Methods & Research

Show all 6 references

Cited by (50)

1. Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
   Hair, Joe F., Ringle, Christian M., Sarstedt, Marko · 2011 · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice
2. Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
   Gioia, Dennis A., Corley, Kevin G., Hamilton, Aimee L. · 2013 · Organizational Research Methods
3. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective
   Gold, Andrew H., Malhotra, Arvind, Segars, Albert H. · 2001 · Journal of Management Information Systems
4. Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration1
   Wetzels, Martin, Odekerken-Schröder, Gaby, van Oppen, Claudia · 2009 · MIS Quarterly
5. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models
   Bagozzi, Richard P., Yi, Youjae · 2012 · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

See all 1,745