Cited by 417Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEarly Childhood Education and Development

What No Child Left Behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades.

Open access
Duckworth, Angela L., Quinn, Patrick D., Tsukayama, Eli·2012·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The increasing prominence of standardized testing to assess student learning motivated the current investigation. We propose that standardized achievement test scores assess competencies determined more by intelligence than by self-control, whereas report card grades assess competencies determined more by self-control than by intelligence. In particular, we suggest that intelligence helps students learn and solve problems independent of formal instruction, whereas self-control helps students study, complete homework, and behave positively in the classroom. Two longitudinal, prospective studies of middle school students support predictions from this model. In both samples, IQ predicted changes in standardized achievement test scores over time better than did self-control, whereas self-control predicted changes in report card grades over time better than did IQ. As expected, the effect of self-control on changes in report card grades was mediated in Study 2 by teacher ratings of homework completion and classroom conduct. In a third study, ratings of middle school teachers about the content and purpose of standardized achievement tests and report card grades were consistent with the proposed model. Implications for pedagogy and public policy are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0026280

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Middle school students' IQ predicts standardized achievement test scores better than self-control, while self-control predicts report card grades better than IQ.

    “Evidence from other studies bears this out: middle school students’ IQ predicts standardized achievement tests scores better than self-control while self-control predicts report card grades better than IQ [92].”

    From Does time management work? A meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [92]

  • Standardized achievement tests better predict IQ, whereas grades better predict academic behaviors.

    “Standardized achievement tests and grades differ to the extent that standardized achievement tests better predict IQ, whereas grades better predict academic behaviors”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gottfredson LS Schools and the g factor The Wilson Quarterly 2004 34 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2012-05
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
439-451
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2144163412
Cited by
416
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 9
FWCI
28.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K01-AG033182)
  • U.S. Department of Education (R305B090015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
No Child Left Behind Act, standardized achievement tests, report card grades, IQ, self-control, intelligence, academic performance, homework completion, classroom behavior, junior high school students, teacher ratings, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review