Cited by 224School Choice and PerformanceUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation

Cook, Stuart W.·1985·American Psychologist

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.40.4.452

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The contact hypothesis assumes that the status of participants from the two social groups must be equal in the situation in which the contact occurs.

    “Similarly, the related contact hypothesis assumes that “the status of the participants from the two social groups must be equal in the situation in which the contact occurs” (Cook, 1985, p. 453).”

    From Measuring affective polarization: Matching concepts to measures (2026) · cites this paper as Cook, 1985

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, S. W.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Stuart W.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1985
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
452-460
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2081349426
Cited by
224
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
17.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
school desegregation, social problems, social experiment, racial segregation
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Prejudice, Race Relations, Schools, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review