Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan.
Abstract
Attachment theorists maintain that cultural differences are relatively minor, and they focus on universals. Here the authors highlight evidence of cultural variations and note ways in which attachment theory is laden with Western values and meaning. Comparisons of the United States and Japan highlight the cultural relativity of 3 core hypotheses of attachment theory: that caregiver sensitivity leads to secure attachment, that secure attachment leads to later social competence, and that children who are securely attached use the primary caregiver as a secure base for exploring the external world. Attachment theorists use measures of sensitivity, competence, and secure base that are biased toward Western ways of thinking: The measures emphasize the child's autonomy, individuation, and exploration. In Japan, sensitivity, competence, and secure base are viewed very differently, calling into question the universality of fundamental tenets of attachment theory. The authors call for an indigenous approach to the psychology of attachment.
Cites (47)
- Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Markus, Hazel R., Kitayama, Shinobu · 1991 · Psychological Review
- Untitled work1978 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
- Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications1999 · Choice Reviews Online
- A secure base: parent-child attachment and healthy human development1989 · Choice Reviews Online
- Attachment theory and close relationships1998 · Choice Reviews Online
- Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachmentDe Wolff, Marianne S, van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H · 1997 · Child Development
- Handbook of social psychologyDantzer, R. · 1990 · Neuropsychologia
- Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention.Mark T. Greenberg, Dante Cicchetti, Edward Mark Cummings · 1990 · University of Chicago Press eBooks
- Attachment as an Organizational Framework for Research on Close RelationshipsHazan, Cindy, Shaver, Phillip R. · 1994 · Psychological Inquiry
- Untitled work1973
Cited by (20)
- Cultural Pathways Through Universal DevelopmentGreenfield, Patricia M., Keller, Heidi, Fuligni, Andrew, Maynard, Ashley · 2003 · Annual Review of Psychology
- The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groupsBakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. · 2009 · Attachment & Human Development
- Experiences of Autonomy and Control Among Chinese Learners: Vitalizing or Immobilizing?Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Zhou, Mingming, Lens, Willy, Soenens, Bart · 2005 · Journal of Educational Psychology
- Representational and questionnaire measures of attachment: A meta-analysis of relations to child internalizing and externalizing problems.Madigan, Sheri, Brumariu, Laura E., Villani, Vanessa, Atkinson, Leslie, Lyons-Ruth, Karlen · 2016 · Psychological Bulletin
- Attachment and CultureKeller, Heidi · 2013 · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0003-066x.55.10.1093
- The paper
- Rothbaum, F. M., Weisz, J. R., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Morelli, G. A. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.10.1093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.