The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attachment theory and close relationships
Abstract
Part I: Introduction. Simpson, Rholes, Attachment in Adulthood. Part II: Measurement Issues. Bartholomew, Shaver, Methods of Assessing Adult Attachment: Do They Converge? Brennan, Clark, Shaver, Self-Report Measurement of Adult Attachment: An Integrative Overview. Fraley, Waller, Adult Attachment Patterns: A Test of the Typological Model. Klohnen, John, Working Models of Attachment: A Theory-Based Prototype Approach. Part III: Affect Regulation. Mikulincer, Florian, The Relationship between Adult Attachment Styles and Emotional and Cognitive Reactions to Stressful Events. Rholes, Simpson, Stevens, Attachment Orientations, Social Support, and Conflict Resolution in Close Relationships. Feeney, Adult Attachment and Relationship-Centered Anxiety: Responses to Physical and Emotional Distancing. Part IV: Clinical Applications. Dozier, Tyrrell, The Role of Attachment in Therapeutic Relationships. Fraley, Davis, Shaver, Dismissing-Avoidance and the Defensive Organization of Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior. Henry, Holmes, Childhood Revisited: The Intimate Relationships of Individuals from Divorced and Conflict-Ridden Families. Roberts, Noller, The Associations between Adult Attachment and Couple Violence: The Role of Communication Patterns and Relationship Satisfaction. Part V: Conceptual and Empirical Extensions. Kirkpatrick, Evolution, Pair-Bonding, and Reproductive Strategies: A Reconceptualization of Adult Attachment. Brennan, Wu, Loev, Adult Romantic Attachment and Individual Differences in Attitudes toward Physical Contact in the Context of Adult Romantic Relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands
Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10 · Cited by 2,713
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.101 · Cited by 2,112
Why Does Social Exclusion Hurt? The Relationship Between Social and Physical Pain.
MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202 · Cited by 1,712
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 · Cited by 1,601
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 35-6513-35-6513
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W574645501
- Cited by
- 3,626
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attachment theory and close relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.35-6513
- The paper
- Attachment theory and close relationships. (1998). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-6513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.