The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory.
Abstract
The lives of women and men, the relationships that they establish, and their work have changed dramatically in the past 50 years, but the dominant theories driving research in these areas have not. In this article, the authors argue that the facts underlying the assumptions of the classical theories of gender and multiple roles have changed so radically as to make the theories obsolete. Moreover, a large body of empirical data fails to support the predictions flowing from these theories. Yet the development of new theory for guiding research and clinical practice has not kept pace. The authors attempt to fill this theoretical gap by reviewing the research literature and articulating an expansionist theory of gender, work, and family that includes four empirically derived and empirically testable principles better matched to today's realities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Goode, W. J. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092933 · Cited by 2,454
Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis.
Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationGender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283 · Cited by 1,068
Couple resilience to economic pressure.
Conger, R. D., Rueter, M. A., & Elder, G. H. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.54 · Cited by 409
Cited by
When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625 · Cited by 3,837
A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents
Byron, K. (2005) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009 · Cited by 2,336
A resource perspective on the work–home interface: the work–home resources model
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0027974 · Cited by 1,660
Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022170 · Cited by 1,654
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.02.002 · Cited by 1,269
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 781-796
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1519010933
- Cited by
- 1,217
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 77.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0003-066x.56.10.781
- The paper
- Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.10.781
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
