CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 250Child Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infants at social risk: Relations among infant maltreatment, maternal behavior, and infant attachment behavior.

Lyons-Ruth, Karlen, Connell, David B., Zoll, David, Stahl, Julie·1987·Developmental Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0012-1649.23.2.223
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Fifty-six 12-month-old infants, including 10 maltreated infants, 18 nonmaltreated high-risk infants, and 28 matched low-income controls, were videotaped in naturalistic settings at home with their mothers for 40 min and were observed 2 weeks later in the Ainsworth Strange Situation. Maltreating mothers were rated higher than nonmaltreating mothers on covertly hostile and interfering behaviors toward their infants at home. Maltreated infants were more avoidant of their mothers in the Strange Situation than nonmaltreated infants. Correlations between maternal behaviors at home and infant behaviors in the Strange Situation revealed that mothers whose infants displayed resistant behavior on reunion were rated at home as less verbally communicative and mothers whose infants displayed avoidant behavior on reunion were rated at home as more covertly hostile. Infants showing mixed avoidance and resistance were more likely to have extremely uncommunicative mothere than were infants who showed avoidance alone. Use of the behavioral rating scales for avoidance and resistance produced clearer findings than use of the final attachment classifications. Reasons for the discrepancies between analyses of classifications and analyses of behavior ratings were identified.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.23.2.223

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–250 of 250

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lyons-Ruth, K., Connell, D. B., Zoll, D., & Stahl, J.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1987-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
223-232
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
DOI
10.1037/0012-1649.23.2.223
OpenAlex
W1971772185
Cited by
248
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
infant maltreatment, maternal behavior, infant attachment, attachment avoidance, resistant attachment, Ainsworth Strange Situation, home observation, low-income infants, mother-infant interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review