Cited by 158Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Latent growth curve analyses of accelerating decline in cognitive abilities in late adulthood.

Abstract

Latent growth models were applied to data from the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging to discover if the rate of change in cognitive performance increased from middle age to later adulthood. The sample included 590 participants aged 44 to 88 years at first measurement. Data were gathered at 2 follow-up occasions at intervals of 3 years. Cognitive ability was assessed through 11 tests that tapped crystallized, fluid, memory, and spatial abilities and perceptual speed. Results indicated stability for measures of crystallized ability, linear age changes for many cognitive abilities, and a significant acceleration in linear decline after age 65 for measures with a large speed component. Gender differences were found only in mean level, not in rate of decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.535

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less consistent evidence has been gathered regarding gender differences in cognitive change in later adulthood and old age.

    “Less consistent evidence has been gathered regarding gender differences in cognitive change in later adulthood and old age”

    From Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. (2011) · cites this paper as Finkel, Reynolds, McArdle, Gatz, & Pederson, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finkel, D., Reynolds, C. A., McArdle, J. J., Gatz, M., & Pedersen, N. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Southeast (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
535-550
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2053408843
Cited by
158
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG004563, AG-10175, AG04563, AG17561, AG 08724, R01AG010175, R01AG017561, R01AG008724)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
cognitive aging, cognitive decline, old age, latent growth curve models, crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence, memory, spatial ability, perceptual speed, age-related changes, gender differences, Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging
MeSH terms
Adoption, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Aptitude, Cognition, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Social Environment, Twins, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review