Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are There Biological Programming Effects for Psychological Development? Findings From a Study of Romanian Adoptees.

Rutter, Michael, English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team, O'Connor, Thomas G.·2004·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Associations between experiences and outcomes could be due to (a) continuation of adversity or (b) organismic changes, including experience-expectant and experience-adaptive developmental programming. The adoption into British families of children who had been reared in profoundly depriving institutions in Romania presented an opportunity to test mechanisms. Romanian children reared from infancy in very depriving institutions for periods up to 42 months were compared with 52 nondeprived UK-born children placed into adoptive families before the age of 6 months. The results at 6 years of age showed substantial normal cognitive and social functioning after the provision of family rearing but also major persistent deficits in a substantial minority. The pattern of findings suggests some form of early biological programming or neural damage stemming from institutional deprivation, but the heterogeneity in outcome indicates that the effects are not deterministic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.81

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bateson, 1999, Design for a life: How behaviour develops.
  2. 10.1037/0012-1649.22.5.595 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.5.595 · Paper page
  3. Bock. 1991 · doi:10.2307/1506425
  4. Bornstein, 1987, Sensitive periods and development.
  5. Bowlby, 1969, Attachment., Vol. 1
  6. Boyce, 1993, Growth Programme (Version 1 & 2)
  7. 10.1017/S0021963001007417 · doi:10.1017/s0021963001007417
  8. Frankenburg, 1986, Revised Denver Prescreening Developmental Questionnaire (R-PDQ).
  9. 10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.305 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.305 · Paper page
  10. Kagan, 1980, Perspectives on continuity., 26
  11. McEwen, 1999, The effects of stress on structural and functional plasticity in the hippocampus., 475
  12. O'Brien, 1999, Fetal programming: Influences on development and disease in later life.
  13. Rutter. 1981 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb10206.x
  14. Rutter, 2002a, Maternal deprivation., 181
  15. 10.1017/S0021963099003935 · doi:10.1017/s0021963099003935 · Paper page
  16. Rutter, 1998, Retrospective recall recalled., 219
  17. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.291 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.291 · Paper page
  18. Thompson. 1998 · doi:10.1057/9780230390188_1
  19. 1951, Report on the second session, 1951.

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Rutter, M., English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team, & O'Connor, T. G.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2004-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
81-94
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2009989334
Cited by
405
References
95
FWCI
48.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are There Biological Programming Effects for Psychological Development? Findings From a Study of Romanian Adoptees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.81
The paper
Rutter, M., English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) Study Team, & O'Connor, T. G. (2004). Are There Biological Programming Effects for Psychological Development? Findings From a Study of Romanian Adoptees. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.81

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.