The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Child Attachment Interview: A psychometric study of reliability and discriminant validity.
Open accessAbstract
While well-established attachment measures have been developed for infancy, early childhood, and adulthood, a "measurement gap" has been identified in middle childhood, where behavioral or representational measures are not yet sufficiently robust. This article documents the development of a new measure--the Child Attachment Interview (CAI)--which seeks to bridge this gap. The CAI is a semistructured interview, in which children are invited to describe their relationships with their primary caregivers. The coding system is informed by the Adult Attachment Interview and the Strange Situation Procedure, and produces 4 attachment categories along with a continuous measure of attachment security based on ratings of attachment-related dimensions. The main psychometric properties are presented, including interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and concurrent and discriminant validities, both for normally developing children and for those referred for mental health treatment. The CAI correlates as expected with other attachment measures and predicts independently collected ratings of social functioning. The findings suggest that the CAI is a reliable, valid, and promising measure of child-parent attachment in middle childhood. Directions for improvements to the coding system are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,570
The Narrative Construction of Reality
Bruner, J. (1991) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/448619 · Cited by 5,728
Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-1841 · Cited by 5,389
Security in Infancy, Childhood, and Adulthood: A Move to the Level of Representation
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/3333827 · Cited by 4,567
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
(2018) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Intellectual and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.4135/9781483392271.n537 · Cited by 4,109
A Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
Shaffer, D. (1983) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790100074010 · Cited by 3,716 · cited 1×
“The anchor points correspond as closely as possible to those of the Child Global Assessment Scale (Shaffer et al., 1983) and thus cover the full range of possible childhood adaptation, with a score of 70 being the boundary between normal and clinically impaired adaptation.”
Methodvan IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.387 · Cited by 2,243
Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention.
Greenberg, M. T., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (1990) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · Cited by 2,160
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (2026) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003569978-2 · Cited by 1,987
Cited by
Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579409990198 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citationBakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2009) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616730902814762 · Cited by 742
Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: Theory and evidence.
Dykas, M. J., & Cassidy, J. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021367 · Cited by 687
Meta-analytic evidence for stability in attachments from infancy to early adulthood
Pinquart, M., Feußner, C., & Ahnert, L. (2013) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.746257 · Cited by 317
Ensink, K., Normandin, L., Target, M., Fonagy, P., Sabourin, S., & Berthelot, N. (2015) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12074 · Cited by 238
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shmueli-Goetz, Y., Target, M., Fonagy, P., & Datta, A.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 939-956
- ISSN
- 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0599
- OpenAlex
- W2084625896
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Child Attachment Interview: A psychometric study of reliability and discriminant validity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.939
- The paper
- Shmueli-Goetz, Y., Target, M., Fonagy, P., & Datta, A. (2008). The Child Attachment Interview: A psychometric study of reliability and discriminant validity. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.