Cited by 238Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Mentalization in children and mothers in the context of trauma: an initial study of the validity of the Child Reflective Functioning Scale.

Open access
Ensink, Karin, Normandin, Lina, Target, Mary, Fonagy, Peter, Sabourin, Stéphane, Berthelot, Nicolas·2015·British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This study examined the validity of the C hild R eflective F unctioning S cale ( CRFS : E nsink, T arget, & O andason, 2013, Child reflective functioning scale scoring manual: for application to the Child Attachment Interview . L ondon, UK : A nna F reud C entre – U niversity C ollege L ondon), a measure designed to assess reflective functioning ( RF ) or mentalization during middle childhood. Participants were 94 mother–child dyads divided into two subgroups; 46 dyads where children had histories of intrafamilial ( n = 22 dyads) or extrafamilial ( n = 24 dyads) sexual abuse, and a community control group composed of 48 mother–child dyads. RF of children and their mothers was assessed using videotaped and transcribed data gathered using the Child Attachment Interview and the Parent Development Interview ( PDI : S lade, A ber, B resi, B erger, & K aplan, 2004, The parent development interview‐Revised . N ew Y ork, NY : T he C ity U niversity of N ew Y ork). The findings indicate that the CRFS proved reliable, with excellent intraclass correlation coefficients for general RF , as well as RF regarding self and others. Significant differences in RF were found between sexually abused children and the control group, and also between children who had experienced intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse. This provides support for the discriminant validity of the CRFS . Furthermore, maternal RF was associated with child RF . Both abuse and maternal RF made significant contributions to predicting children's RF regarding themselves, but child sexual abuse was the only variable that made a significant contribution to explaining variance in children's RF regarding others.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjdp.12074

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ensink, K., Normandin, L., Target, M., Fonagy, P., Sabourin, S., & Berthelot, N.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Corresponding author
Ensink, Karin
Venue
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-08
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
203-217
ISSN
  • 0261-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-835X
OpenAlex
W2061334458
Cited by
238
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0510-10228, NF-SI-0514-10157)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
mentalization, reflective functioning, child sexual abuse, intrafamilial sexual abuse, mother-child dyads, maternal reflective functioning, middle childhood, discriminant validity, Child Attachment Interview
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Object Attachment, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review