Cited by 26Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Catastrophizing, confounds, and depression: A comment on Sullivan and D'Eon (1990).

Haaga, David A.·1992·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Sullivan and D'Eon (1990) concluded that catastrophizing and depression were conceptually and operationally confounded. I argue that (a) the procedures they used to study confounding were suboptimal because multiple measures of depression and catastrophizing were not employed and (b) the distinctiveness of constructs might better be regarded as a continuous rather than all-or-none (having adequate discriminant validity versus being confounded) concept.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.101.1.206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence indicates that pain catastrophizing is an important predictor of pain outcomes even after controlling for depression.

    “evidence indicates that pain catastrophizing is an important predictor of pain outcomes even after controlling for depression.27,30,42,48,118”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haaga, D. A.
Affiliations
American University (US)
Corresponding author
Haaga, David A.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1992-02
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
206-207
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2027537107
Cited by
26
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
catastrophizing, depression, discriminant validity, pain catastrophizing
MeSH terms
Awareness, Depression, Humans, Pain, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review