CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 255Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting abuse in adolescent dating relationships over 1 year: The role of child maltreatment and trauma

Wolfe, David A., Wekerle, Christine, Scott, Katreena, Straatman, Anna-Lee, Grasley, Carolyn·2004·Journal of Abnormal Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0021-843x.113.3.406
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Three mediators of the relationship between childhood maltreatment and dating violence perpetration during midadolescence (i.e., trauma-related symptoms, attitudes justifying dating violence, and empathy and self-efficacy in dating relationships) were tested over 1 year with a sample of students from 10 high schools (N = 1,317). Trauma-related symptoms had a significant cross-time effect on predicting incidents of dating violence for both boys and girls. Attitudes and empathy and self-efficacy did not predict dating violence over time, although they were correlated with such behavior at both time points. Child maltreatment is a distal risk factor for adolescent dating violence, and trauma-related symptoms act as a significant mediator of this relationship. The importance of longitudinal methodology that separates correlates from predictors is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.113.3.406

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Briere, 1996, Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC): Professional manual.
  2. Capaldi, 2003, The development of aggression in young male-female couples., 243
  3. Jöreskog, 1986, LISREL VI.
  4. Wekerle, 2003, Child maltreatment., 632
  5. Wolfe, (in press). Dating and relationship violence among adolescent girls.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 255

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wolfe, D. A., Wekerle, C., Scott, K., Straatman, A.-L., & Grasley, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2004-08
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
406-415
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
DOI
10.1037/0021-843x.113.3.406
OpenAlex
W2026049321
Cited by
255
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
adolescent dating violence, child abuse, trauma symptoms, dating violence perpetration, empathy, self-efficacy, attitudes toward dating violence, mediation, longitudinal prediction, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child Abuse, Courtship, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Violence, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review