The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managerial myopia: Self-serving biases in organizational planning.
Abstract
Recent work indicates that people hold a variety of self-serving biases, be-lieving themselves more capable than they are in fact. Such biases, if ex-tended to the organizational level, would lead to overly optimistic planning for the future. This prediction was tested with two groups of management students and with a sample of corporate presidents. The management students consistently overestimated their abilities; in a marketing exercise, they like-wise indicated that a hypothetical firm, of which they were sales managers, would quickly overtake established competition. The executive sample also predicted inordinate success; the latter group, however, moderated projections somewhat if prior planning experience had been unsatisfactory. The impor-tance of managerial myopia to considerations of marketing, resource manage-ment, and demarketing is discussed. During the past decade, a number of re-searchers have noted that individuals often view themselves more favorably than seems
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“well over half of survey respondents typically rate themselves in the top 50 percent of drivers (Svenson, 1981), ethics (Baumhart, 1968), managerial prowess (Larwood and Whittaker, 1977), productivity (Cross, 1977), health (Weinstein, 1980) and a variety of desirable skills.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Larwood and Whittaker, 1977
Citations
Cites
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (2012) · Yale University Press eBooks · doi:10.12987/9780300188479-012 · Cited by 5,037
Langer, E. J. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311 · Cited by 3,909
Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076486 · Cited by 2,575
Fischhoff, B., & Beyth, R. (1975) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90002-1 · Cited by 716
Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who Are They?
Kinnear, T. C., Taylor, J. R., & Ahmed, S. A. (1974) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250192 · Cited by 685
An Inquiry into the Human Prospect.
Petersen, W., & Heilbroner, R. L. (1975) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2576116 · Cited by 397
Marketing during Periods of Shortage
Kotler, P. (1974) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224297403800305 · Cited by 153
An Inquiry into the Human Prospect.
Murphy, S., & Heilbroner, R. L. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063662 · Cited by 116
Blackjack and the risky shift, II: Monetary stakes
Blascovich, J., Ginsburg, G. P., & Howe, R. C. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(75)80024-2 · Cited by 55
Determinants of the self-attribution of having influenced another person.
Schopler, J., & Layton, B. D. (1972) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032880 · Cited by 34
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 · Cited by 7,731
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment
Malmendier, U. M., & Tate, G. A. (2005) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x · Cited by 3,645
Metadata
- Authors
- Larwood, L., & Whittaker, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1977-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-198
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2028731944
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Keywords
- managerial myopia, self-serving bias, organizational planning, overconfidence, overestimation of ability, managerial optimism, sales forecasting, marketing planning, planning experience, business executives, demarketing, resource management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review