Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Closed-minded thinking can lead individuals to disparage others' opinions or arguments.
“Closed- minded thinking can lead individuals to disparage others' opinions or arguments 110 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [110]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amason, A. C. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256633 · Cited by 2,584 · see citing works
Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility
Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Richter, F. D., & Tjosvold, D. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.65.1.74 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationPOSITIVE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT: A FIELD ASSESSMENT
Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1990) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/eb022674 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tjosvold, D., & Deemer, D. K.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 590-595
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2121051892
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 24.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- controversy, organizational decision-making, competitive environment, group decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
