Cited by 74Conflict Management and NegotiationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorTeam Dynamics and Performance

POSITIVE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT: A FIELD ASSESSMENT

Cosier, Richard A., Dalton, Dan R.·1990·International Journal of Conflict Management

Abstract

Research relying on laboratory protocol and case studies has demonstrated positive effects from cognitive conflict and controversy. Reported benefits have included better judgments, improved strategic decisions and a better understanding of others' positions. This study develops and assesses the psychometric properties of an instrument designed to examine decision conflict in field settings. This instrument was administered on site to 63 managers. Factors identified in the instrument were disagreement, openness, and control. Interestingly, the openness dimension was positively associated with job commitment. The control factor was inversely associated with job satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/eb022674

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Task-related disagreement enhances performance by encouraging members to question assumptions and offer alternative viewpoints.

    “While conflict is often seen as disruptive, task-related disagreement enhances performance by encouraging members to question assumptions and offer alternative viewpoints (Baron, 1991, 1997; Cosier and Dalton, 1990).”

    From The Groupfeel syndrome: a theory of a counterproductive group emotion (2026) · cites this paper as Cosier and Dalton, 1990

  • The motivation or pressure to maintain a consistently positive group emotion discourages dissent and constructive conflict, thereby hindering the robust information exchange and critical evaluation vital for high-quality decisions.

    “This pressure discourages dissent and constructive conflict, thereby hindering the robust information exchange and critical evaluation vital for high-quality decisions (Baron, 1991, 1997; Cosier and Dalton, 1990).”

    From The Groupfeel syndrome: a theory of a counterproductive group emotion (2026) · cites this paper as Cosier and Dalton, 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Conflict Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1990-01-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
81-92
ISSN
1044-4068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051953394
Cited by
74
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Conflict Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
decisional conflict, cognitive conflict, managers, instrument development, psychometric properties, disagreement, openness, control, work commitment, job satisfaction, field evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review