Cited by 2,584Team Dynamics and PerformanceConflict Management and NegotiationLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

DISTINGUISHING THE EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT ON STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING: RESOLVING A PARADOX FOR TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.

Amason, A. C.·1996·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

Top management teams make strategic decisions, and the products of their decision making influence organizational performance. However, a subtle paradox is embedded in this relationship. This study focuses on conflict as the crux of this paradox and provides evidence from two different samples of conflict's consistent yet contradictory effects on decision quality, consensus, and affective acceptance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256633

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By embracing stakeholder tension, firms become more receptive to new ideas, obtain a deeper understanding of opposing viewpoints, and question longheld assumptions, which results in better decisions that are understood and accepted by stakeholders.

    “In line with insights from strategic decision making (Amason 1996), we suggest that by embracing stakeholder tension, firms become more receptive to new ideas, obtain a deeper understanding of opposing viewpoints, and question longheld assumptions, which results in better decisions that are understood and accepted by stakeholders.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amason, A. C.
Affiliations
Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Amason, A. C.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1996-02-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
123-148
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W1967352038
Cited by
2,584
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 127 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 127 · 2014: 126 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 129
FWCI
45.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
top management teams, conflict, functional conflict, dysfunctional conflict, strategic decision-making, decision quality, consensus, paradox

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review