The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations.
Abstract
South Bend, IndianaThe present study examined (a) the effect of organizational type (a manipulatedvariable) on individuals' information-privacy values, beliefs, attitudes, and be-havioral intentions and (b) relationships between the same measured variablesSix organizational types were used (1 e., employers, insurance companies, lawenforcement agencies, credit grantors, lending institutions, and the Internal Rev-enue Service). Data on the dependent variables were obtained through the useof structured interviews involving 193 randomly selected residents of a mid-western state Multivanate and univanate analyses revealed (a) significant dif-ferences among the organizational types on information-privacy values, beliefs,and attitudes, and (b) significant correlations between these and other measuredvanables The implications of these findings for organizational and societal policymaking concerning the treatment of information about individuals are discussed
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“some blockchain research solutions [92], and platforms such as Tangle [93] or Wanchain [19] employ crypto-algorithms resistant to quantum computing.”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“In this case, storeman nodes (groups of entities) keep part of the private keys of a source chain account, and manage a smart contract that locks the asset on the original chain, avoiding that a node can access to the full private key of such as original account.”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“In blockchain, SMPC can be used for splitting the smart-contract execution as well as account and key management without requiring any third-party participation, as proposed in [19], a ledger aimed to enable the exchange of digital assets among different blockchain networks.”
From Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Influencing attitudes and changing behavior
Miller, J. (1970) · AORN Journal · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(07)60703-0 · Cited by 376
Conceptions of Privacy: Current Status and Next Steps
Margulis, S. T. (1977) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01879.x · Cited by 267
Marshall, N. J. (1972) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf01531349 · Cited by 118
Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment.
Tolchinsky, P. D., McCuddy, M. K., Adams, J., Ganster, D. C., Woodman, R. W., & Fromkin, H. L. (1981) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.3.308 · Cited by 98
Variables affecting perceptions of invasion of privacy in a personnel selection situation.
Fusilier, M. R., & Hoyer, W. D. (1980) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.5.623 · Cited by 80
Wilson, D. W., & Donnerstein, E. (1976) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.31.11.765 · Cited by 44
Rosenbaum, B. L. (1973) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036294 · Cited by 38
Stone, D. L. (1981) · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · Cited by 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013
Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals’ Concerns About Organizational Practices1
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249477 · Cited by 2,266
Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409971 · Cited by 1,339
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148715 · Cited by 1,252
An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument
Stewart, K. A., & Segars, A. H. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.36.97 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, E. F., Gueutal, H. G., Gardner, D. G., & McClure, S.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- ORCID
- Gardner, Donald G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1983-08
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 459-468
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2039669983
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Keywords
- data privacy, privacy attitudes, privacy values, behavioral intention, organizational type, insurance companies, law enforcement agencies, credit institutions, Internal Revenue Service, personal information disclosure, privacy policies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
