The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Much evidence exists that supports the use of goal setting as a motivational technique for enhancing task performance; howevei; little attention has been given to the role of task characteristics as potential moderating conditions of goal effects. Meta-analysis procedures were used to assess the moderator effects of task complexity for goal-setting studies conducted from 1966 to 1985 (n = 125). The reliability ofthe task complexity ratings was .92. Three sets of analyses were conducted: for goaldifficulty results (hard vs. easy), for goal specificity-difficulty (specific difficult goals vs. do-best or no goal), and for all studies collapsed across goal difficulty and goal specificity-difficulty. It was generally found that goal-setting effects were strongest for easy tasks (reaction time, brainstorming), d = .76, and weakest for more complex tasks (business game simulations, scientific and engineering work, faculty research productivity), d = .42. Implications for future research on goal setting and the validity of generalizing results are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Resulting flaws concerning information processing capacities emerge often in the psychological literature in which “complexity” and “difficulty” of tasks are used interchangeably (see for examples: Wood et al., 1987; McDowd and Craik, 1988).”
From Human- versus Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Wood et al., 1987
Citations
Cites
Thompson, V. A., & March, J. G. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2090830 · Cited by 3,351
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 · Cited by 2,675
Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017 · Cited by 1,511
Task complexity: Definition of the construct
Wood, R. E. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0 · Cited by 1,393
Self-citationFeldman, J. M., Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258247 · Cited by 1,203
Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.673 · Cited by 1,060
Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis.
Mabe, P. A., & West, S. G. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280 · Cited by 973
Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance.
Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.241 · Cited by 942
Combining results of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910
Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529 · Cited by 769
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 597
Harrison, D. A., & Liska, L. Z. (1994) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb02409.x · Cited by 39
Changing Behavior: A Theory- and Evidence-Based Approach
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.001 · Cited by 47
Tarrant, M., Haslam, C., Carter, M., Calitri, R., & Haslam, S. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.044 · Cited by 38
Correcting effect sizes computed from factor analysis of variance for use in meta-analysis.
Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (1997) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.2.192 · Cited by 37
Process in skill acquisition: motivation, interruptions, memory, affective states, and metacognition
Langan‐Fox, J., Armstrong, K., Balvin, N., & Anglim, J. (2002) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050060210001706746 · Cited by 36
Changing Behavior Using Integrated Theories
Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.015 · Cited by 44
Putting first things first: Outcome and process focus in knowledge work teams
Woolley, A. W. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.578 · Cited by 34
Improving safety behaviour using goal setting and feedback
Marsh, T. W., Robertson, I. T., Duff, A. R., Phillips, R. A., Cooper, C., & Weyman, A. K. (1995) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437739510076395 · Cited by 34
Siddiqui, R. A., May, F. B., & Monga, A. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.002 · Cited by 33
“We show that people are not uniformly attuned to task complexity (Wood, 1986; Wood et al., 1987).”
BackgroundButler, C., Peters, J., & Stott, N. C. H. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6982.784 · Cited by 32
Bates, T. C., Enkhbat, T., Gray, E., Lee, J., & Zakharin, M. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112331 · Cited by 32
Distant but Fair: Intra-Team Justice Climate and Performance in Dispersed Teams
Magni, M., Ahuja, M. K., & Maruping, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1522909 · Cited by 33
“This represents an important boundary condition that the simple reliance on dispersed teams in an attempt to leverage dispersed knowledge is not sufficient for managing complex tasks [108] and that it requires managerial interventions in shaping the justice climate in which these members operate.”
BackgroundIndividual and Group Performance: Effects of Task Complexity and Information
Kernan, M. C., Bruning, N. S., & Miller-Guhde, L. (1994) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0704_3 · Cited by 32
Changing Behavior Using the Transtheoretical Model
DiClemente, C. C., & Graydon, M. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.010 · Cited by 35
A study of motivational influences on academic achievement
Dishon-Berkovits, M. (2014) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9257-7 · Cited by 38
Leadership and Temperament Congruence: Extending the Expectancy Model of Work Motivation
Humphreys, J. H., & Einstein, W. O. (2004) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190401000405 · Cited by 31
Tripathi, R., Cervone, D., & Savani, K. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218764663 · Cited by 33
Toward Understanding the Relationship between Task Complexity and Task Performance
Liu, P., & Li, Z. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21660-2_22 · Cited by 31
“Different researchers and studies had a great variation and confounding about the way to understand and to operationalize task complexity [5,6].”
BackgroundTask Strategy Interventions in Goal Setting: The Importance of Search in Strategy Development
Earley, P. C., Connolly, T., & Lee, C. (1989) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638901500408 · Cited by 31
Target Setting in Multi-Divisional Organizations
Matějka, M. (2018) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-52159 · Cited by 30
Changing Behavior Using the Health Belief Model and Protection Motivation Theory
Orbell, S., Zahid, H., & Henderson, C. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.004 · Cited by 35
Smith, B. (2009) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/09652540903371729 · Cited by 30
“Similarly, task complexity reduces goal effects (Wood, Mento, & Locke, 1987 ), while appropriate and timely feedback increases the link between goal and performance (Becker, 1978 ).”
BackgroundThe relationship between a comprehensive strategic approach and small business performance
Williams, R. I., Manley, S. C., Aaron, J. R., & Daniel, F. (2018) · Journal of Small Business Strategy · Cited by 30
Grbac, B., Martin, J. H., & Martin, B. A. (1998) · Journal of managerial issues · Cited by 29
HR outsourcing and service quality: theoretical framework and empirical evidence
Braun, I., Pull, K., Alewell, D., Störmer, S., & Thommes, K. (2011) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483481111118667 · Cited by 29
“define the concept simply in terms of strong demands for a complex decision-making process, Wood et al. (1987)”
BackgroundCarroll, A., Houghton, S. J., Hattie, J., & Durkin, K. (2001) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · Cited by 27
Hofmann, D. A. (1993) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01068.x · Cited by 29
The Impact of Goal Specificity and Task Complexity on Basketball Skill Development
Burton, D. (1989) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.3.1.34 · Cited by 29
Changing Behavior by Changing Environments
Marteau, T. M., Fletcher, P. C., Hollands, G. J., & Munafo, M. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.014 · Cited by 32
Giannini, J., Weinberg, R. S., & Jackson, A. (1988) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.10.4.408 · Cited by 28
“Wood et al. (1986) conducted a meta-analysis of task complexity and goal effects in 125 industrial goal-setting studies and found that goal-setting effects were strongest for simple tasks (e.g., reaction time, brainstorming) and weakest for more complex tasks (e.g., engineering work, research…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRevisiting Goals, Feedback, Recognition, and Performance Success
Unger-Aviram, E., Zwikael, O., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2013) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601113500142 · Cited by 28
“In support of previous research (Wood et al., 1987), the results showed PM goal attainment activity to be positively associated with performance; however this association was contingent on the performance success dimension measured.”
ResultKeiser, N. L., & Arthur, W. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09784-x · Cited by 31
“Task complexity is a key consideration in goal setting theory (Locke & Latham, 2002, 2006; Wood et al., 1987).”
BackgroundBrown, T. C., McCracken, M., & Hillier, T. (2013) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2013.812291 · Cited by 27
“In fact, a meta-analysis (Wood, Mento, and Locke 1987) found that the positive effects of outcome goals were strongest for straightforward tasks (e.g. simple mathematics) and weakest for complex tasks (e.g. business simulations).”
BackgroundChong, V. K., & Tak‐Wing, S. L. (2003) · Asian Review of Accounting · doi:10.1108/eb060760 · Cited by 27
Young, S. (2013) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.016 · Cited by 26
Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Behavior Change Interventions: A Ten-Task Guide
Abraham, C., & Denford, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.019 · Cited by 27
Changing Behavior Using the Reflective-Impulsive Model
Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.012 · Cited by 30
Effect of task complexity on motor and cognitive preparatory brain activities
Mussini, E., Berchicci, M., Bianco, V., Perri, R. L., Quinzi, F., & Russo, F. D. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.11.008 · Cited by 25
Coe, R. (1998) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/0267152980130104 · Cited by 27
Wood, R. E., Roberts, V. L., & Whelan, J. (2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444395150.ch10 · Cited by 26
Should We All Work in Sprints? How Agile Project Management Improves Performance
Lieberum, T., Schiffels, S., & Kolisch, R. (2022) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.1091 · Cited by 25
Dyadic Behavior Change Interventions
Scholz, U., Berli, C., Lüscher, J., & Knoll, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.043 · Cited by 26
Economic Determinants and Consequences of Performance Target Difficulty
Kim, S., Matějka, M., & Park, J. (2022) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-2021-0319 · Cited by 24
Goal Setting and Exercise Performance
Smith, J. A., Hauenstein, N. M. A., & Buchanan, L. B. (1996) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0902_3 · Cited by 24
Developing Behavior Change Interventions
Hankonen, N. E., & Hardeman, W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.021 · Cited by 28
Pierce, B. E., & Burton, D. (1998) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.12.2.156 · Cited by 24
Brown, T. C., & McCracken, M. (2010) · Journal of General Management · doi:10.1177/030630701003500402 · Cited by 24
Cowie, M., Taylor, D., & Croxford, L. (2007) · Scottish Educational Review · doi:10.1163/27730840-03901004 · Cited by 24
Task choice and assigned goals as determinants of task motivation and performance
Shapira, Z. (1989) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90023-x · Cited by 23
Examining the Effects of Feedback-giving as a Gamification Mechanic in Crowd Rating Systems
Tang, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, T., & Zeng, Z. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1917866 · Cited by 24
“Task complexity refers to the number of distinct information cues about task-related stimulus objects (Wood, 1986; Wood et al., 1987).”
BackgroundRothman, A. J., Klein, W. M. P., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.020 · Cited by 26
Exploring the Meaning and Usefulness of Measures of Subjective Goal Difficulty1
Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00957.x · Cited by 23
Behavioral Simulation: Application and Potential in Management Research
Gist, M. E., Hopper, H., & Daniels, D. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819813001 · Cited by 23
Work Engagement in Agile Teams: Extending Multilevel JD‐R Theory
Junker, T. L., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D., & Pletzer, J. L. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2860 · Cited by 35
Leadership Self‐Efficacy and Effectiveness: The Moderating Influence of Task Complexity
Ali, H. E., Schalk, R., Engen, M. L. V., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2018) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.21550 · Cited by 22
Hadi, N. U., & Chaudhary, A. (2021) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-10-2020-0085 · Cited by 32
Imagery, Visualization, and Mental Simulation Interventions
Hagger, M. S., & Conroy, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.033 · Cited by 23
Changing Behavior Using the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation
Cameron, L. D., Fleszar‐Pavlović, S. E., & Khachikian, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.005 · Cited by 29
The effects of team strategic orientation on team process and information search
Woolley, A. W., Bear, J. B., Chang, J. W., & DeCostanza, A. H. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.06.002 · Cited by 22
Diefenbacher, S., Fliss, P. M., Tatzel, J., Wenk, J., & Keller, J. (2019) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.02.001 · Cited by 21
Goal Setting and Feedback for the Development of Instructional Strategies
Tzetzis, G. C., Kioumourtzoglou, E., & Mavromatis, G. (1997) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1411 · Cited by 21
Engagement of Stakeholders in the Design, Evaluation, and Implementation of Complex Interventions
Hudson, J. L., Moon, Z., Hughes, L. D., & Moss-Morris, R. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.024 · Cited by 20
Practical Applications of Goal Setting Theory to Performance Management
Heslin, P. A., Carson, J. B., & Vandewalle, D. (2008) · Cited by 20
Peng, A. C., Dunn, J., & Conlon, D. E. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.008 · Cited by 20
The Influence of Affect on Goal Choice and Task Performance
Davis, M. A., Kirby, S. L., & Curtis, M. B. (2007) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00144.x · Cited by 20
Uri Gneezy, B., Kajackaite, A., & Meier, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.036 · Cited by 20
The effects of group size and task complexity on deadline reactivity
Kim, J.-E., Nembhard, D. A., & Kim, J. H. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2016.09.011 · Cited by 20
The Relationship between Work Setting and Employee Behaviour:
Robertson, P. J. (1994) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534819410063700 · Cited by 20
“Exploration of job design as a moderator of the effects of goals on work behaviour might also prove fruitful (see Wood et al. , 1987”
BackgroundCharacterising the goals of juvenile delinquents: Nature, content and purpose
Carroll, A. (1994) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/10683169508411960 · Cited by 19
GAMIFICATION IN ACCOUNTING AND STUDENTS’ SKILLSET
Durso, S. D. O., Reginato, L., & Cornacchione, E. B. (2020) · Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting · doi:10.14392/asaa.2019120305 · Cited by 29
Schoenherr, T. (2022) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2022.102972 · Cited by 22
Brusso, R. C., & Orvis, K. A. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.006 · Cited by 18
Ruiter, R. A. C., Crutzen, R., de Leeuw, E., & Kok, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.018 · Cited by 20
EFFECTS OF GOAL ORIENTATION AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON AUDIT JUDGMENT PERFORMANCE
Sanusi, Z. M., Iskandar, T. M., & Poon, J. M. L. (2000) · doi:10.24191/mar.v6i2.515 · Cited by 18
Brunstein, J. C., & Heckhausen, H. (2018) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53927-9_6 · Cited by 21
The combined effects of goal type and cognitive ability on performance
Seijts, G., & Crim, D. (2009) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-009-9143-3 · Cited by 18
“Prior goal setting studies have shown that task complexity is a moderator of goal effects: the magnitude of the goal-to-performance effect decreases when the complexity of the task increases (e.g., Wood et al. 1987 ).”
BackgroundA Performance Metric and Goal‐Setting Procedure for Deadline‐Oriented Processes
Doerr, K. H., & Gue, K. R. (2012) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01375.x · Cited by 18
“The basic finding that specific, difficult goals have a positive impact on performance has been validated numerous times through original work and several meta-analyses (Johnson et al. 1981, Tubbs 1986, Wood et al. 1987).”
BackgroundInfluentialCareer development and vocational behavior, 1987: A review
Phillips, S. D., Cairo, P. C., Blustein, D. L., & Myers, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(88)90054-1 · Cited by 18
ANALYSIS OF WORK GROUP PRODUCTIVITY IN AN APPLIED SETTING: APPLICATION OF A TIME SERIES PANEL DESIGN
Sawyer, J. E., Latham, W. R., Pritchard, R. D., & Bennett, W. R. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00185.x · Cited by 18
The Effects of Different Behavioral Goals on Transfer from a Management Development Program
Brown, T. C., Warren, A. M., & Khattar, V. (2016) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21257 · Cited by 17
Performing versus adapting: how leader’s coaching style matters in Hong Kong
Hui, R. T., Sue‐Chan, C., & Wood, R. E. (2019) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2019.1569547 · Cited by 17
Therapeutic Interventions in the Treatment of Problematic Internet Use—Experiences from Germany
Dau, W., Hoffmann, J. D. G., & Banger, M. (2015) · Studies in neuroscience, psychology and behavioral economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07242-5_12 · Cited by 17
Drach‐Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (1999) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00041-0 · Cited by 17
Bressler, L. A., & Bressler, M. E. (2007) · International Journal of Innovation and Learning · doi:10.1504/ijil.2007.012382 · Cited by 17
The impact of positive and negative feedback on reaction time in brain-damaged patients.
Gauggel, S., Wietasch, A., Bayer, C., & Rolko, C. (2000) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037//0894-4105.14.1.125 · Cited by 17
THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL GOAL WEIGHTS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF A COMPLEX FINANCIAL TASK
Edmister, R. O., & Locke, E. A. (1987) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00612.x · Cited by 17
Goal Setting as a Motivational Technique for Neurorehabilitation
Gauggel, S. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9780470979952.ch24 · Cited by 17
Stretch Goals, Factual/Counterfactual Reflection Strategies, and Firm Performance
Yang, M. M.-H. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12931 · Cited by 16
Rethinking Gamification Failure: A Model and Investigation of Gamified System Maladaptive Behaviors
Tseng, S.-L., Sun, H., Santhanam, R., Lu, S., & Thatcher, J. B. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.0284 · Cited by 18
Entrepreneurs’ motivation: a conceptual process theory
Schjoedt, L., & Shaver, K. G. (2019) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2019.1596398 · Cited by 17
“Goal specificity – the degree to which a goal is clearly defined – is shown to have a positive relationship with goal attainment (Mento, Steel, and Karren 1987; Wood, Mento, and Locke 1987).”
BackgroundChanging Behavior Using Social Identity Processes
Reynolds, K. J., Branscombe, N. R., Subašić, E., & Willis, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.016 · Cited by 21
Mussini, E., Berchicci, M., Bianco, V., Perri, R. L., Quinzi, F., & Russo, F. D. (2020) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.042 · Cited by 16
Do Accounting Performance Measures Indeed Reduce Managerial Ambiguity Under Uncertainty?
Hartmann, F. G. H. (2007) · Advances in management accounting · doi:10.1016/s1474-7871(07)16005-6 · Cited by 16
Goal Setting and Achievement Motivation in Sport
Duda, J. L. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-12-657410-3/00804-7 · Cited by 16
Führung im Orchester: Kunst ohne künstlerische Freiheit? Eine empirische Untersuchung
Boerner, S., & Krause, D. E. (2002) · German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung · doi:10.1177/239700220201600104 · Cited by 15
Radosevich, D. J., Allyn, M. R., & Yun, S. (2007) · Seoul Journal of Business · doi:10.35152/snusjb.2007.13.1.002 · Cited by 15
“…in over 500 empirical studies (e.g., Latham, Locke, and Fassina 2002) as well as metaanalyses in the goal setting literature (Tubbs 1986; Wood, Mento, and Locke 1987); individuals assigned challenging goals outperform those assigned easy or vague goals by 0.82 standard deviations, on…”
BackgroundInfluentialTuttle, B. M., & Harrell, A. M. (2001) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2001.15.2.81 · Cited by 15
Innovation and change in a rehabilitation unit for the elderly : Through action research
Hoogwerf, L. (2002) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 13
A three‐step model for the gamification of training and automaticity acquisition
Jamshidifarsani, H., Tamayo‐Serrano, P., Garbaya, S., & Lim, T. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12539 · Cited by 14
Computerized Assessment of Cognitive Development in Neurotypical and Neurodivergent Children
Danilov, I. V., Mihailova, S., & Svajyan, A. (2022) · OBM Neurobiology · doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2203137 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1987-08
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 416-425
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2067506429
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- goal setting, task complexity, goal difficulty, goal specificity, task performance, motivation, moderator effects, reaction time, brainstorming, research productivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review