Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project.

Garland, Howard·1990·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Les relations fonctionnelles entre les couts et la decision de poursuivre un investissement dans un projet de recherche et de developpement sont examinees avec 407 etudiants en commerce. Les sujets lisent un scenario dans lequel 10%, 30%, 50%, 70% ou 90% d'un budget de 10 millions de dollars ont ete investis. Un groupe doit indiquer s'il est souhaitable d'investir les fonds restants pour finir le projet. Un second groupe indique s'il investirait volontiers un million de dollars de plus pour poursuivre le projet. Le troisieme groupe evalue si le projet donnera des profits

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.728

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Garland, H.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1990
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
728-731
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2010123235
Cited by
338
References
2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.728
The paper
Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.728

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.