Eastern values: A comparison of managers in the United States, Hong Kong, and the People's Republic of China.

Abstract

This study assessed the differences and similarities in values among practicing managed in the United States, Hong Kong, and the People's Republic of China. The Chinese Value Survey (CVS), an instrument based on Eastern cultural values, was used instead of the typically used Western instruments. Discriminant analysis was used to identify which of four CVS dimensions accounted for the significant differences among the the subject groups. The models of the discriminant analysis are discussed and compared with the hypothesized relationships among the three countries

Cites (2)

1. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
   Kirk, Roger · 2013
2. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups
   George, Jennifer M. · 1990 · Journal of Applied Psychology

Show all 2 references

Cited by (5)

1. Contributing to global management knowledge: a case for high quality indigenous research.
   Tsui, Anne S. · 2004 · Asia Pacific Journal of Management
2. Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes
   Gerstner, Charlotte R., Day, David V. · 1994 · The Leadership Quarterly
3. Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions.
   Peng, Kaiping, Nisbett, Richard E., Wong, Nancy Y. C. · 1997 · Psychological Methods
4. Harmony, hierarchy and conservatism: a cross-cultural comparison of Confucian values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan
   Zhang, Yan Bing, Lin, Mei-Chen, Nonaka, Akihiko, Beom, Khisu · 2005 · Communication Research Reports
5. A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner?
   Riordan, C · 1994 · Journal of Management

See all 199