Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity.

Abstract

Research investigating the validity of personality measures has established these measures as useful selection tools. However, personality measures are vulnerable to response distortion leading to employer concerns about the influence of applicant faking, with specific concerns about the influence of social desirability. A traditional method used to circumvent this is the application of a correction based on a social desirability scale score. This study sought to evaluate whether such corrections are effective tools for removing the influence of intentional distortion. A within-subjects design facilitated comparisons between honest, faked, and corrected scores. The goal was to evaluate whether a social desirability correction allows one to approximate an individual's honest score. The results suggest that a social desirability correction is ineffective and fails to produce a corrected score that approximates an honest score. Results are interpreted with respect to applicant comparison and construct validity.

Cites (4)

1. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
   BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
2. Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
   Paulhus, Delroy L. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation
   Furnham, Adrian · 1986 · Personality and Individual Differences
4. Response Sets and Test Validity
   Cronbach, Lee J. · 1946 · Educational and Psychological Measurement

Show all 4 references

Cited by (13)

1. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?
   Barrick, Murray R., Mount, Michael K., Judge, Timothy A. · 2001 · International Journal of Selection and Assessment
2. An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.
   Connelly, Brian S., Ones, Deniz S. · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
3. A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research
   Conway, James M., Huffcutt, Allen I. · 2003 · Organizational Research Methods
4. RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS
   MORGESON, FREDERICK P., CAMPION, MICHAEL A., DIPBOYE, ROBERT L., HOLLENBECK, JOHN R., MURPHY, KEVIN, SCHMITT, NEAL · 2007 · Personnel Psychology
5. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
   McFarland, Lynn A., Ryan, Ann Marie · 2000 · Journal of Applied Psychology

See all 314