The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Change in the Relationship Between Commitment and Turnover: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach.
Abstract
Through the use of affective, normative, and continuance commitment in a multivariate 2nd-order factor latent growth modeling approach, the authors observed linear negative trajectories that characterized the changes in individuals across time in both affective and normative commitment. In turn, an individual's intention to quit the organization was characterized by a positive trajectory. A significant association was also found between the change trajectories such that the steeper the decline in an individual's affective and normative commitments across time, the greater the rate of increase in that individual's intention to quit, and, further, the greater the likelihood that the person actually left the organization over the next 9 months. Findings regarding continuance commitment and its components were mixed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408 · cited 1×
“Specifically, we used the following five fit indices to assess model fit: (a) the chi-square goodness of fit test, (b) the comparative fit index (CFI; Bentler, 1990), (c) Bentler and Bonett’s (1980) nonnormed fit index (NNFI), which is a generalization of the Tucker–Lewis index (Tucker & Lewis, 1973), (d) the standard…”
MethodMathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Cited by
THE RELATIONSHIPS OF AGE WITH JOB ATTITUDES: A META-ANALYSIS
NG, T. W. H., & FELDMAN, D. C. (2010) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x · Cited by 819
Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion.
Hom, P. W., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027983 · Cited by 608
PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A LATENT GROWTH MODELING APPROACH
PETERSON, S. J., LUTHANS, F., AVOLIO, B. J., WALUMBWA, F. O., & ZHANG, Z. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01215.x · Cited by 573
A person‐centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology
Meyer, J. P., & Morin, A. J. S. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2085 · Cited by 487
Panaccio, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2009) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.002 · Cited by 466
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C., Vandenberg, R., & Stinglhamber, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468-482
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2033405899
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Change in the Relationship Between Commitment and Turnover: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468
- The paper
- Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C., Vandenberg, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The Role of Change in the Relationship Between Commitment and Turnover: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
