The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Turnover Intentions and Voluntary Turnover: The Moderating Roles of Self-Monitoring, Locus of Control, Proactive Personality, and Risk Aversion.
Abstract
This article explores moderators of the relationship between turnover intentions and turnover behavior to better explain why some employees translate intentions into behavior and other employees do not. Individual differences in self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion were examined. Results indicate that self-monitoring and risk aversion moderate the intentions-turnover link. Specifically, the relationship between turnover intentions and turnover is stronger for low self-monitors and those lower in risk aversion. Locus of control moderated the relationship in 1 of 2 samples such that the relationship was stronger for those with an internal locus of control. Proactive personality, however, did not directly moderate the relationship between intentions and turnover behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1
Ajzen, I. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x · Cited by 7,629
Proactive Behavior in Organizations
Crant, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600304 · Cited by 2,701
Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control.
Spector, P. E. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.482 · Cited by 981
Apples and oranges (and pears, oh my!): the search for moderators in meta-analysis
Cortina, J. M. (2003) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428103257358 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature
Fuller, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008 · Cited by 688
Racial differences in employee retention: Are diversity climate perceptions the key?
McKAY, P. F., AVERY, D. R., TONIDANDEL, S., MORRIS, M. A., HERNANDEZ, M., & HEBL, M. R. (2007) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00064.x · Cited by 561
Halter, M., Boiko, O., Pelone, F., Beighton, C., Harris, R., Gale, J., Gourlay, S., & Drennan, V. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2707-0 · Cited by 366
Getting more likes: the impact of narrative person and brand image on customer–brand interactions
Chang, Y., Li, Y., Yan, J., & Kumar, V. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00632-2 · Cited by 161
Huang, S., Yin, H., & Lv, L. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1543855 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P., & Moffitt, K. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 980-990
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2050981487
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
