Cited by 98Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Ambulatory computer‐assisted therapy for obesity: A new frontier for behavior therapy

Burnett, Kent F., Taylor, C. Barr, Agras, W. Stewart·1985·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.53.5.698

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burnett, K. F., Taylor, C. B., & Agras, W. S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1985
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
698-703
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2031312688
Cited by
97
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, computer-assisted therapy, behavior therapy, outpatient care, weight loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Computers, Diet, Reducing, Feedback, Female, Humans, Microcomputers, Middle Aged, Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review