Cited by 263Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Therapist behavior as a determinant for client noncompliance: a paradox for the behavior modifier

Patterson, G. R., Forgatch, M. S.·1985·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.53.6.846

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patterson, G. R., & Forgatch, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1985
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
846-851
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W4252632020
Cited by
263
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
therapist behavior, medication adherence, paradox, behavior modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review