Cited by 379Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentInfant Health and Development

Maternal and infant temperamental predictors of attachment: A meta-analytic review

Goldsmith, H. H., Alansky, Jennifer A.·1987·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.55.6.805

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldsmith, H. H., & Alansky, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1987-12
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
805-816
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2046501684
Cited by
379
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH41200)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-00694)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
maternal temperament, infant temperament, attachment, parent-infant relationship, attachment security
MeSH terms
Psychology, Child, Humans, Infant, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Object Attachment, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review