The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing a typology of batterers
Abstract
A. Holtzworth-Munroe and G. L. Stuart (1994) proposed a tripartite typology of men who batter their female partners based on the severity of violence, extent of violence, and personality disorder characteristics. The current study attempts to empirically validate this typology using data from 75 domestically violent (DV) men and their partners, and 32 maritally distressed, nonviolent (DNV) comparison couples. Mixture analysis results generally supported the model, although 2 types were not distinguishable on personality disorder characteristics as predicted. Generally violent batterers were significantly more violent within and outside the relationship. The pathological group was moderately violent within and outside the relationship and endorsed numerous psychological symptoms. Family-only batterers endorsed fewer symptoms and were less violent. Violence in the family of origin, attachment, and communication skills also differentiated the 3 types and DNV men.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“it has been asserted that a subtype of individuals, being mostly antisocial and highly violent, are especially prone to be avoidant (Waltz et al., 2000).”
From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Waltz et al., 2000
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
(1993) · Cited by 7,136
Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads
Spanier, G. B. (1976) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350547 · Cited by 7,095
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
Cary, G. L. (1994) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1994.48.1.155 · Cited by 6,299
Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales
Straus, M. A. (1979) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351733 · Cited by 6,187
Drake, M. M. (1988) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.42.10.683b · Cited by 5,303
Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644 · Cited by 3,678
Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959) · Marriage and Family Living · doi:10.2307/348022 · Cited by 2,913
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Duncan, 1961, A socioeconomic index for all occupations., 109
- 10.1037/0893-3200.11.3.314 · DOI
- Millon, 1987, Manual for the MCMI-II.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anger, hostility, and male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review
Norlander, B., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2004) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.10.001 · Cited by 351
Controversies Involving Gender and Intimate Partner Violence in the United States
Langhinrichsen‐Rohling, J. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9628-2 · Cited by 306
“, intimate terrorism and situational couple violence) has received consistent empirical replication (Delsol et al. 2003; Graham-Kevan and Archer 2003; Waltz et al. 2000).”
BackgroundBirkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002 · Cited by 325
Typologies of Men Who Are Maritally Violent
Holtzworth‐Munroe, A., & Meehan, J. C. (2004) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260504269693 · Cited by 263
Babcock, J. C., Miller, S., & Siard, C. (2003) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00095 · Cited by 229
“General violence was assessed using a questionnaire modified from an interview format used in a previous study of typologies of male batterers (Waltz et al., 2000).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Montana (US)
- University of Houston (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 658-669
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2008299012
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000257-09, 1r37mh044063-01a1, 5r01mh043101-06)
- National Institute of Mental Health (5R37-MH44063-04, 5RO1 MH 43101-04, K02-MH00257)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Keywords
- domestic violence, batterer typology, intimate partner violence, personality disorders, mixture analysis, attachment, communication skills, marital distress, psychological symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Self Disclosure, Spouse Abuse, Violence, Cluster Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
