The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims.
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to compare cognitive-processing therapy (CPT) with prolonged exposure and a minimal attention condition (MA) for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. One hundred seventy-one female rape victims were randomized into 1 of the 3 conditions, and 121 completed treatment. Participants were assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, the PTSD Symptom Scale, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Trauma-Related Guilt Inventory. Independent assessments were made at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3 and 9 months posttreatment. Analyses indicated that both treatments were highly efficacious and superior to MA. The 2 therapies had similar results except that CPT produced better scores on 2 of 4 guilt subscales.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although exposure-based therapies have the largest and strongest research evidence base (Cusack et al., 2016), research and meta-analyses comparing PE, CPT and trauma-focused CBT do not find that one treatment outperforms the other (Resick et al., 2002, 2008; Powers et al., 2010; Cusack et al., 2016).”
From Treating PTSD: A Review of Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Interventions (2018) · cites this paper as Resick et al., 2002
In the citing paper
“PE consistently outperforms control and waitlist conditions in randomized controlled trials (Powers et al., 2010; Resick et al., 2002)”
From Augmenting Prolonged Exposure therapy for PTSD with intranasal oxytocin: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial (2018) · cites this paper as Resick et al., 2002
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 · Cited by 11,696
Selective Cortical Undercutting As a Means of Modifying and Studying Frontal Lobe Function in Man
Scoville, W. B. (1949) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1949.6.1.0065 · Cited by 7,374
The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., & Keane, T. M. (1995) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.2490080106 · Cited by 5,024
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder
Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Dancu, C. V., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1993) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.2490060405 · Cited by 2,537
Research design in clinical psychology
Kazdin, A. E. (1952) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195201)8:1 · Cited by 2,153
Freeman, A. M. (2001) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v62n1112 · Cited by 1,667
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1007/BF02105408 · DOI · Paper page
- Calhoun, 1993, PTSD., 48
- Cohen, 1988, Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences
- Foa, 1996, Mechanics of change in exposure therapy., 329
- Resick, 1992, Cognitive treatment of a crime-related PTSD., 171
- Resick, 1991, Clinical treatment of adult female victims of sexual assault., 261
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Treating PTSD in primary care: One small step is one giant leap.
Pomerantz, A. S. (2017) · Families Systems & Health · doi:10.1037/fsh0000318 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Resick, P. A., Nishith, P., Weaver, T. L., Astin, M. C., & Feuer, C. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 867-879
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- PMC
- PMC2977927
- OpenAlex
- W1972193811
- Cited by
- 1,294
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 37.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH051509, 1-R01-MH51509)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- cognitive processing therapy, prolonged exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder, rape victims, depression, trauma-related guilt, psychotherapy efficacy, treatment comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Random Allocation, Rape, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
