Parent-child interaction therapy: A comparison of standard and abbreviated treatments for oppositional defiant preschoolers.
Abstract
Families of 54 behaviorally disturbed preschool-aged children (3 to 5 years) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment conditions: standard parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT; STD); modified PCIT that used didactic videotapes, telephone consultations, and face-to-face sessions to abbreviate treatment; and a no-treatment waitlist control group (WL). Twenty-one nondisturbed preschoolers were recruited as a social validation comparison condition. Posttreatment assessment indicated significant differences in parent-reported externalizing behavior in children, and parental stress and discipline practices from both treatment groups on most measures compared with the WL group. Clinical significance testing suggested a superior effect for the STD immediately after intervention, but by 6-month follow-up, the two groups were comparable. The findings indicate that abbreviated PCIT may be of benefit for families with young conduct problem children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing treatment studies frequently examine parental reports of stress or parenting efficacy, leaving a gap in the views of treated children.
“these studies frequently examine parental reports of stress due to children’s dysfunctional behaviors or perceptions of parenting efficacy (e.g., Nixon, Sweeney, Erickson, & Touyz, 2003), leaving a gap in the views of treated children.”
From Perceived Parent–Child Relations, Conduct Problems, and Clinical Improvement Following the Treatment of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Nixon, Sweeney, Erickson, & Touyz, 2003
Cites
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770 · see citing works
Defining empirically supported therapies.
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.7 · Cited by 3,067 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Second, this finding is extremely relevant to the issue of making interventions more cost-effective (Chambless & Hollon, 1998).”
BackgroundRandomized trial of two parent-training programs for families with conduct-disordered children
Webster-Stratton, C. (1984) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.52.4.666 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Integration of Traditional and Behavioral Concerns
Eyberg, S. (1988) · Child & Family Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1300/j019v10n01_04 · Cited by 415 · cited 12× · see citing works
“The findings of the current study suggest that the use of didactic videotapes and phone consultations will play a significant role in allowing PCIT (and other programs) to be more readily accessible and cost-effective to families in need.”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Eckshtain, D., Ugueto, A. M., Vaughn-Coaxum, R., Jensen-Doss, A., Hawley, K. M., Krumholz Marchette, L. S., Chu, B. C., et al. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0040360 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A Meta-analysis
Thomas, R., Abell, B., Webb, H. J., Avdagic, E., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2017) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2017-0352 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Father Involvement in Parent Training
Lundahl, B. W., Tollefson, D., Risser, H., & Lovejoy, M. C. (2008) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731507309828 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Forehand, R., Lafko, N., Parent, J., & Burt, K. B. (2014) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.10.001 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Parent-child interaction therapy and chronic illness: A case study
Bagner, D. M., Fernandez, M. A., & Eyberg, S. M. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1023/b:jocs.0000016264.02407.fd · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for Toddlers: A Pilot Study
Kohlhoff, J., & Morgan, S. (2014) · Child & Family Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1080/07317107.2014.910733 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Booker, J. A., Ollendick, T. H., Dunsmore, J. C., & Greene, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0323-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nixon, R. D. V., Sweeney, L., Erickson, D. B., & Touyz, S. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-260
- ISSN
- 1939-2117
- 0022-006X
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
