Cited by 138Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

Cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy as a maintenance treatment for chronic depression

Klein, Daniel N., Santiago, Neil J., Vivian, Dina, Blalock, Janice A., Kocsis, James H., Markowitz, John C., McCullough, James P., Rush, A. John +9 more·2004·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Although the efficacy of maintenance pharmacotherapy for the prevention of recurrence in major depressive disorder (MDD) is well documented, few studies have tested the efficacy of psychotherapy as a maintenance treatment. The authors examined the efficacy of the cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) as a maintenance treatment for chronic forms of MDD. Eighty-two patients who had responded to acute and continuation phase CBASP were randomized to monthly CBASP or assessment only for 1 year. Significantly fewer patients in the CBASP than assessment only condition experienced a recurrence. The 2 conditions also differed significantly on change in depressive symptoms over time. These findings support the use of CBASP as a maintenance treatment for chronic forms of MDD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.72.4.681

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, D. N., Santiago, N. J., Vivian, D., Blalock, J. A., Kocsis, J. H., Markowitz, J. C., McCullough, J. P., Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Arnow, B. A., Dunner, D. L., Manber, R., Rothbaum, B., Thase, M. E., Keitner, G. I., Miller, I. W., & Keller, M. B.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2004
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
681-688
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2083325602
Cited by
138
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH061590)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
CBASP, maintenance therapy, chronic depression, major depressive disorder, depression recurrence prevention, psychotherapy, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review