Cited by 21Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

A Patient Stratification Approach to Identifying the Likelihood of Continued Chronic Depression and Relapse Following Treatment for Depression

Open access
Saunders, Rob, Cohen, Zachary D., Ambler, Gareth, DeRubeis, Robert J., Wiles, Nicola, Kessler, David, Gilbody, Simon, Hollon, Steve D. +9 more·2021·Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract

Background: Subgrouping methods have the potential to support treatment decision making for patients with depression. Such approaches have not been used to study the continued course of depression or likelihood of relapse following treatment. Method: Data from individual participants of seven randomised controlled trials were analysed. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups based on baseline characteristics. Associations between profiles and odds of both continued chronic depression and relapse up to one year post-treatment were explored. Differences in outcomes were investigated within profiles for those treated with antidepressants, psychological therapy, and usual care. Results: Seven profiles were identified; profiles with higher symptom severity and long durations of both anxiety and depression at baseline were at higher risk of relapse and of chronic depression. Members of profile five (likely long durations of depression and anxiety, moderately-severe symptoms, and past antidepressant use) appeared to have better outcomes with psychological therapies: antidepressants vs. psychological therapies (OR (95% CI) for relapse = 2.92 (1.24–6.87), chronic course = 2.27 (1.27–4.06)) and usual care vs. psychological therapies (relapse = 2.51 (1.16–5.40), chronic course = 1.98 (1.16–3.37)). Conclusions: Profiles at greater risk of poor outcomes could benefit from more intensive treatment and frequent monitoring. Patients in profile five may benefit more from psychological therapies than other treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jpm11121295

Cites

69 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In major depressive disorder, 18-77% of patients experienced a relapse.

    “Likewise, with regard to major depressive disorder (MDD), 18–77% of patients experienced a relapse [22–28].”

    From Psychological interventions to prevent relapse in anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Discussion reports relapse likelihoods of 17.5%–45.7% across patient profiles, not 18%–77%. Its 77.5% figure refers to continued chronic depression, a separate outcome defined in Methods §2.3. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Pies R. Are antidepressants effective in the acute and long-term treatment of depression? Sic et non Innov. Clin. Neurosci. 2012 9 31 40 PMC3398684 22808447
  2. [58]Stata Statistical Software: Release 16 Stata Press College Station, TX, USA 2019

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saunders, R., Cohen, Z. D., Ambler, G., DeRubeis, R. J., Wiles, N., Kessler, D., Gilbody, S., Hollon, S. D., Kendrick, T., Watkins, E., Richards, D., Brabyn, S., Littlewood, E., Sharp, D., Lewis, G., Pilling, S., & Buckman, J. E. J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, 425 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Sir Henry Wellcome Building for Mood Disorders Research, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK
  • Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO)
  • St Pancras Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Buckman, Joshua E. J.
Venue
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-04
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
1295
ISSN
2075-4426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200528146
Cited by
21
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (201292/Z/16/Z)
  • MQ Foundation (MQDS16/72)
  • Higher Education Funding Council for England (-)
  • UCL Biomedical Research Centre (-)
  • University College London (-)
  • Vanderbilt University (-)
  • University of Southampton (-)
  • University of Exeter (-)
  • University of York (-)
  • NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (-)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
chronic depression, depression relapse, patient stratification, latent profile analysis, symptom severity, depression duration, anxiety, antidepressants, psychotherapy, usual care, treatment decision-making, personalized treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review