Cited by 49Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesProblem Solving Skills DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Comparison of Compensation and Capitalization Models When Treating Suicidality in Young Adults.

Wingate, LaRicka R., Van Orden, Kimberly A., Joiner, Thomas E., Williams, Foluso M., Rudd, M. David·2005·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The current study examined compensation and capitalization treatment models with specific reference to problem-solving appraisal and problem-solving treatment of suicidal behavior (M. D. Rudd, T. Joiner, & M. H. Rajab, 2000). A sample of 98 young adults (mean age = 22), who had recently attempted suicide or ideated about suicide to the degree that they came to clinical attention, were randomly assigned to either problem-solving or control treatment. Participants with poorer problem-solving appraisal at baseline responded better than did participants with greater problem-solving appraisal to problem-solving treatment at 6-month follow-up, as would be predicted by the compensation model. Results suggest that treatment of suicidality for individuals with problem-solving skill deficits may be most effective by targeting these deficits rather than capitalizing on strengths.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.73.4.756

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wingate, L. R., Van Orden, K. A., Joiner, T. E., Williams, F. M., & Rudd, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2005-08
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
756-762
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2043655511
Cited by
49
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicidality, young adults, compensation model, problem-solving appraisal, problem-solving therapy, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, treatment outcome prediction, problem-solving skills
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, Psychotherapy, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review