CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 212Doctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsCounseling Practices and SupervisionMentoring and Academic Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the working alliance in advisor–advisee relationships in graduate school.

Schlosser, Lewis Z., Gelso, Charles J.·2001·Journal of Counseling Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.157
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Drawing from the working alliance literature, the authors constructed the Advisory Working Alliance Inventory (AWAI) to measure the graduate advising relationship from the student's perspective. Two hundred eighty-one counseling psychology doctoral students participated in the 1st study (79% response rate). Three factors (Rapport, Apprenticeship, and Identification-Individuation) were extracted by factor analysis. The AWAI showed very good internal consistency reliability. Scale validity was supported by positive correlations between the AWAI and measures of advisee research self-efficacy and attitudes toward research, as well as the perceived expertness, attractiveness, and trustworthiness of the advisor. Forty-one students participated in the 2nd study, in which the AWAI demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability over a 2-week interval. Implications of the advising working alliance are discussed for doctoral training and areas for future research are provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.157

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1037/0735-7028.24.4.468 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0735-7028.22.5.362 · DOI
  4. Magoon, 1984, Research training and supervision., 682
  5. Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
  6. 10.1037/0022-0167.32.3.458 · DOI
  7. 10.1207/s15328023top2401_3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–212 of 212

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schlosser, L. Z., & Gelso, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
ORCID
Gelso, Charles J.
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2001-04
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
157-167
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
DOI
10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.157
OpenAlex
W1997509231
Cited by
211
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, graduate student advising, supervisor-student relationship, doctoral students, rapport, apprenticeship, research self-efficacy, scale development, counseling psychology training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review