The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Depth of processing and interference effects in the learning and remembering of sentences.
Open accessAbstract
Made available in DSpace on 2010-12-21T22:38:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 ctrstreadtechrepv01977i00021_opt.pdf: 468702 bytes, checksum: fc0cfed576de26c1552cbf88c2c06fb2 (MD5) ctrstreadtechrepv01977i00021_tei.xml: 47904 bytes, checksum: 6c352b8b7de184a00c21b8422657443a (MD5) license.txt: 4924 bytes, checksum: 09e9f63a96b1a6d0405b83d57199700c (MD5) Previous issue date: 1977
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, it is difficult to explain Kane and Anderson's (1978) findings by Grimaldi and Karpicke's account, since in their undetermined condition the targets were unrelated to the most obvious, incorrect, completions so it is highly unlikely that they would have been retrieved along with them.”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Kane and Anderson's (1978)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Even in the undetermined condition, where participants nearly always produced an error, generating led to better final test performance than reading.”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Kane & Anderson, 1978
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Underwood, B. J. (1957) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0044616 · Cited by 853
Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0028372 · Cited by 455
Critical issues in interference theory
Postman, L. J., & Underwood, B. J. (1973) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03198064 · Cited by 422
On Asking People Questions about What They are Reading
Anderson, R. C., & Biddle, W. B. (1975) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60269-8 · Cited by 374
Self-citationDelay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests.
Kulhavy, R. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1972) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033243 · Cited by 209
Self-citationImproving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of processing and context
Schallert, D. L. (1976) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/0022-5371(76)90055-4 · Cited by 185
Effects of three types of inserted questions on learning from prose.
Watts, G. H., & Anderson, R. C. (1971) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031633 · Cited by 164
Self-citationDelay-retention effect in natural classroom settings.
Surber, J. R., & Anderson, R. C. (1975) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077003 · Cited by 78
Self-citationLearning Concepts from Definitions
Anderson, R. C., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1972) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161754 · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–115 of 115
Enhancing Memory for Lecture Sentences: A Depth of Processing Perspective
Morgan, S. V., & Puglisi, J. T. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.675 · Cited by 2
Memory for Prose: Relational and Lexical Item-Specific Processing for Intentional Recall
Dinnel, D. L., & Glover, J. A. (1986) · Journal of Reading Behavior · doi:10.1080/10862968609547577 · Cited by 2
Memory interference and the benefits and costs of testing
Potts, R. B. (2014) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 2
Using repeated testing and variable encoding to promote transfer of learning
Butler, A. C. (2009) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/k7tq5znx · Cited by 1
Attentional and Non-attentional Effects of Prequestioning
Taylor, J. C. (1996) · MacSphere (McMaster University) · doi:10.71548/19526 · Cited by 1
Running head: FEEDBACK AND SPACING EFFECTS
Smith, T. A., & Kimball, D. R. (2010)
Center for the Study of Reading
Straker, D. Y. (1987)
The Effect of Overt/Covert Unsuccessful Retrieval upon Subsequent Learning
서, 혜., Park, J., & 남, 서. (2012) · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 · doi:10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.3.001
The effect of generating errors on subsequent learning and generalization
Siler, J. (2017) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Strong, B. (2017) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17065166
Lexical inferencing as a generation effect for foreign language vocabulary learning
Dessenberger, S. J., Wang, K., Jordan, E., & Sommers, M. S. (2022) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01348-5 · Cited by 1
Enhancing acquisition of technical vocabulary: an intervention with secondary school students
Pająk, N., & Ellis, M. (2025) · Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Poznaniu · doi:10.58683/dnswsb.2008
Phase 4: Making Mistakes and Learning
(2021) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64802-534-120251014
Learning from mistakes: Objective and subjective error magnitudes predict the testing effect
Shi, A., & Liu, X. L. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-026-03009-z · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kane, J. H., & Anderson, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Queens College, CUNY (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1978-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 626-635
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2065778132
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- levels of processing, proactive interference, sentence learning, sentence recall, recognition memory, sentence completion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
