The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten.
Abstract
The "testing " phenomenon refers to the finding that students who take a test on material between the time they first study and the time they take a final test remember more of the material than students who do not take an intervening test. 4 experiments examined the testing phenomenon in student's memory for brief passages and labels for parts of flowers. Experiments la and lb demonstrated the generality of the phenomenon to the methods and materials used in the current study. Experiment 2 ruled out an "amount of processing " hypothesis as a way of accounting for the testing phenomenon. The results of Experiment 3 seemed to indicate that the testing phenomenon resided in the number of complete retrieval events. Experiments 4a, 4b, and 4c focused on the completeness of retrieval events and indicated that the influence of retrieval on later memory performance was determined, at least in part, by the completeness of the initial retrieval event. Although there are numerous reasons for testing students' learning, one important factor is that tests improve students' memory for content (Modigliani & Hedges, 1987). In typical laboratory studies examining the so-called testing phenomenon,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In Glover's (1989) study, final recall was greater when an initial test had occurred.Both college students remembering an essay and seventh-grade students learning parts of a flower benefited from having taken a test (without feedback) 4 days before the final test.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Glover 1989
Citations
Cites
Spitzer, H. F. (1939) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0063404 · Cited by 306
When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects
Cuddy, L. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1982) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(82)90727-7 · Cited by 170
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–185 of 185
Retrieval Practice in Memory- and Language-Impaired Populations: A Systematic Review.
de Lima, M. D., Cavendish, B., de Deus, J. S., & Buratto, L. (2020) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acaa035 · Cited by 17
“In such designs, the processing type is confounded with the processing time, which can prevent robust conclusions concerning the benefits of RP (see Glover, 1989).”
BackgroundResultEnhancing the quantity and accuracy of eyewitness memory via initial memory testing
Pansky, A., & Nemets, E. (2012) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.06.001 · Cited by 17
Hopper, W. J., & Huber, D. E. (2018) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.04.005 · Cited by 22
“…clear that there is a single mechanism underlying all retrieval-based learning), but focus on the benefits of recall practice considering that test practice benefits are largest after taking a recall practice test as compared to a recognition practice test (Carpenter & DeLosh, 2006; Glover, 1989).”
ResultA Classroom Study on the Role of Prior Knowledge and Retrieval Tool in the Testing Effect
Francis, A. P., Wieth, M. B., Zabel, K. L., & Carr, T. H. (2020) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725720924872 · Cited by 17
“Further, the testing effect is greater when the initial retrieval involves more effort than when it requires less effort on the part of the learner (e.g., Carpenter & DeLosh, 2006; Glover, 1989; Kornell, Hays, & Bjork, 2009; Pyc & Rawson, 2009).”
BackgroundDo reminders of the crime reverse the memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia?
Mangiulli, I., Lanciano, T., van Oorsouw, K. V., Jelícic, M., & Curci, A. (2019) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-019-00939-z · Cited by 15
“Generally speaking, rehearsal can enhance memory consolidation (Anderson, Bjork, & Bjork, 1994; Glover, 1989), improving memory for facts, such as spatial and temporal details, and activity components of the events (Marsh, Tversky, & Hutson, 2005).”
BackgroundPilotti, M., Chodorow, M., & Petrov, R. (2009) · The Journal of general psychology · doi:10.3200/genp.136.2.179-204 · Cited by 15
Higher retention after a new take-home computerised test
Park, J., & Choi, B. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00752.x · Cited by 15
Incidental Vocabulary Learning and Retention from Audiovisual Input and Factors Affecting Them
Fakhr, M. A., Farahani, D. B., & Farahani, A. A. K. (2020) · English Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1007/s42321-020-00066-y · Cited by 27
Kreiter, C. D., Green, J., Lenoch, S., & Saiki, T. (2012) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9395-7 · Cited by 13
“The five remaining studies in Table 1 measured undergraduate student performance on educationally relevant materials in academic disciplines outside of medicine (Glover 1989.”
Turner, N. M., Scheffer, R., Custers, E. J. F. M., & ten Cate, O. (2011) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2010.542521 · Cited by 14
“The effect of testing on learning and retention (known as the testing effect) has been demonstrated in psychological research and in several educational contexts including life-support courses (Glover 1989; Roediger et al. 2002; Roediger & Karpicke 2006; Kerfoot et al. 2007; Kromann et al. 2009).”
BackgroundResultTesting the reminding account of the lag effect in L2 vocabulary learning
Koval, N. G. (2021) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716421000370 · Cited by 20
“Retrieval practice is believed to be more beneficial the more effortful, or complete the retrieval (Bjork, 1975; Glover, 1989; Pyc & Rawson, 2009; Whitten & Bjork, 1977).”
BackgroundResultStrategic retrieval prevents memory interference: The temporal dynamics of retrieval orientation
Kerrén, C., Bramão, I., Hellerstedt, R., & Johansson, M. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107776 · Cited by 14
“For example, the elaborative processing view (Glover, 1989; Whitten and Leonard, 1980) holds that memory performance on the final memory test will depend on how elaborative the intervening retrieval phase is.”
Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval
Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819847141 · Cited by 13
“This is already known to be the case in other domains (Bjork & Whitten, 1974; Carpenter & DeLosh, 2006; Glover, 1989; Kang et al., 2007; McDaniel, Anderson, Derbish, & Morrisette, 2007).”
InfluentialZheng, M. S., O'Brien, K., Cuenin, K., Lyon, C., & Bender, D. J. (2022) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/jdd.13066 · Cited by 18
Examining the contributions of desirable difficulty and reminding to the spacing effect
Maddox, G. B., Pyc, M. A., Kauffman, Z. S., Gatewood, J. D., & Schonhoff, A. M. (2018) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0843-3 · Cited by 18
“Indeed, several notable studies have considered response latency for the detection of repetitions or for the retrieval of a previously studied item as an index of desirable difficulty (e.g., Glover, 1989; Karpicke & Roediger, 2007; Logan & Balota, 2008; Maddox & Balota, 2015; Pyc & Rawson, 2009).”
BackgroundCloning the professor, an alternative to ineffective teaching in a large course.
Nelson, J., Robison, D. F., Bell, J. D., & Bradshaw, W. (2009) · CBE - Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.09-01-0006 · Cited by 11
Bego, C. R., Lyle, K. B., Ralston, P. A. S., Immekus, J. C., Chastain, R. J., Haynes, L. D., Hoyt, L. K., Pigg, R. M., Rabin, S. D., Scobee, M. W., et al. (2024) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00468-5 · Cited by 12
Effects of retrieval practice on retention and application of complex educational concepts
Corral, D., & Carpenter, S. K. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102219 · Cited by 20
Barenberg, J., Berse, T., Reimann, L., & Dutke, S. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3796 · Cited by 12
Memory in Educational Settings
Marsh, E. J., & Butler, A. C. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0020 · Cited by 8
“20_Reisberg_ch20.indd 7 10/13/2012 7:19:36 PM 8 memory in educational settings opportunities (e.g., Glover, 1989).”
May, B. M. (2021) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2021.1961034 · Cited by 8
True-False Testing on Trial: Guilty as Charged or Falsely Accused?
Brabec, J. A., Pan, S. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09546-w · Cited by 14
“Glover (1989) contributed to the resolution of this issue in an exploration of the mnemonic value of various practice test formats, including a true-false recognition test.”
BackgroundRetrieval practice and retention of course content in a middle school science classroom
Rowley, T., & McCrudden, M. T. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3710 · Cited by 17
Exploring the Consequences on Memory of Students Who Know They Have Access to Recorded Lectures
Patel, B., Yook, G., Mislan, S., & Persky, A. (2019) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe6958 · Cited by 9
“Reviewing recorded lectures after attending a lecture is similar to re-reading or reviewing material, which may not be the most efficient study strategy; rereading often leads to high immediate recall performance but a reduction in their delayed recall performance, which suggests that students are not deeply learning…”
BackgroundHuang, S., Cao, H.-W., Wang, J., & Liu, S. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15111540 · Cited by 11
“Specifically, higher cognitive effort during active retrieval produces greater learning gains, whereas when retrieval becomes easier and cognitive effort declines, the benefits of retrieval practice may diminish (Glover, 1989; Karpicke & Roediger, 2007; Pyc & Rawson, 2009).”
Differences between Visual Style and Verbal Style Learners in Learning English
Chen, C.-J. (2014) · International Journal of Distance Education Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijdet.2014010106 · Cited by 8
Bencze, D., Szöllősi, Á., Németh, K., & Racsmány, M. (2022) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108341 · Cited by 8
“Additionally, recall tests are suggested to be more effective in terms of long-term memory performance, as compared to various types of recognition memory tests (e.g., Glover, 1989; McDaniel, Anderson, Derbish, & Morrisette, 2007; see also the meta-analytic review of Rowland, 2014).”
The effect of practice test modality on perceived mental effort and delayed final test performance
Coppens, L. C., de Jonge, M., van Gog, T., & Kester, L. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2020.1822366 · Cited by 13
Bazelais, P., Doleck, T., & Lemay, D. (2017) · Journal of Formative Design in Learning · doi:10.1007/s41686-017-0012-2 · Cited by 7
“Moreover, a body of work promoting the beneficial effects of continuous assessment argues for a testing effect, that is, test-taking generally facilitates subsequent learning and retention (Glover 1989; McDaniel and Fisher 1991; Roediger and Karpicke 2006).”
BackgroundLiu, X. L., O’Reilly, R. C., & Ranganath, C. (2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2021.07.003 · Cited by 11
Nursing students' experiences with test-enhanced learning in teams: A cross-sectional study.
Emblemsvåg, M. S. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106188 · Cited by 6
Ryan, A., & WILKINSON, T. J. (2021) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2075 · Cited by 6
“Recall enhanced learning (previously known as test enhanced learning) describes the improvements in short- and long- term memory that occurs after testing events (Glover, 1989; Roediger and Karpicke, 2006a).”
BackgroundBlendermann, M. F., Little, J. L., & Gray, K. M. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1733614 · Cited by 6
Effects of making errors in learning a foreign language
Guzmán-Muñoz, F. J. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2020.1711766 · Cited by 12
Retrieval practice can improve classroom review despite low practice test performance
Leggett, J. M. I., Burt, J. S., & Carroll, A. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3517 · Cited by 10
Incorporation of practice testing to improve knowledge acquisition in a pharmacotherapy course
LaDisa, A. G., & Biesboer, A. N. (2017) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.002 · Cited by 5
Videotapes and multiple interviews: The effects on the child witness
Martin, S. E., & Thomson, D. M. (1994) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719409524835 · Cited by 7
Enhancing Students’ Learning of Factual Knowledge
Hew, K., & Cheung, W. (2014) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-089-6_6 · Cited by 6
Goldstein, H., Rau, L.-M., Humberg, C., Bachhausen, V., Stahlschmidt, L., & Wager, J. (2025) · Headache · doi:10.1111/head.14923 · Cited by 5
“Headache-specific knowledge was not evaluated at T3 to minimize testing effects 17,18 and participant burden.”
The benefits of elaborative encoding over retrieval practice for associative learning
Jaeger, A., Martins, T. H. P. G., Rodrigues, J. P. P., Muniz, B. F. B., Fonseca, A. L. S. D. S., & Gonçalves, A. D. O. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01671-z · Cited by 6
“For more than a century, research has shown that recalling studied information is highly beneficial for memory retention (e.g., Abbott, 1909; Glover, 1989; Rothkopf, 1966; Spitzer, 1939; Yuille, 1973).”
Retrieval practice reduces relative forgetting over time
Nickl, A. T., & Bäuml, K. T. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2023.2270735 · Cited by 5
“…the view that not only retrieval practice with feedback but also retrieval practice without feedback may reduce time-dependent forgetting, which indicates that successful retrieval during practice potentiates later recall at test (Glover, 1989; Halamish & Bjork, 2011; Pashler et al., 2005).”
BackgroundPROTOCOL: Testing frequency and student achievement: A systematic review
Thomsen, M. K., Seerup, J. K., Dietrichson, J., Bondebjerg, A., & Viinholt, B. C. A. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1212 · Cited by 9
Chen, X., Zhang, M., & Liu, X. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00987 · Cited by 7
“We use two different initial testing formats, cued-recall and multiple-choice, to examine the generalization of results to the situation when the initial test and the final test are in different format, particularly when the initial test is a multiple-choice test, which has been shown to be less effective than a cued-…”
MethodJia, J.-Y., Ding, Z.-H., Chen, Y.-H., & Cui, X.-M. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0137-6.ch012 · Cited by 4
The Effect of Intervening Tests on Text Retention
Kester, L., & Tabbers, H. K. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8827-8_25 · Cited by 3
Asher, M. W., & Carvalho, P. F. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10103-6 · Cited by 3
“Second, the multiple-choice format for both practice and memory test questions may have inflated memory scores by encouraging item-specific recognition or reliance on superficial fea - tures rather than genuine recall (see Glover, 1989; Kang et al., 2007; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006).”
The dual-process perspective and the benefits of retrieval practice in younger and older adults
Shaffer, R. A., & McDermott, K. B. (2022) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2027986 · Cited by 5
“…Dual-process; retrieval practice; aging; recollection; familiarity An extensive literature has revealed that taking tests – or retrieval practice – benefits long term retention of material, a finding referred to as the “testing effect” (Glover, 1989; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006a; McDermott, 2021).”
BackgroundRole of interactive presentation platform ASQ in delivering web design course
Bratić, B., Triglianos, V., Kurbalija, V., Pautasso, C., & Ivanović, M. (2020) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-020-00123-w · Cited by 3
“There is also strong evidence (Glover 1989; Morris et al. 1977; McDaniel et al. 2007; Kang et al. 2007) that suggests that the more effort-full free recall format for quizzes (such as short text quizzes or programming tasks) perform better in terms of learning outcomes compared to cued recall or…”
BackgroundThe Effect of Retrieval Practice on Transitive Inference
Picklesimer, M. E., Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2019) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000467 · Cited by 4
The testing effect in immediate recognition: tests of the episodic context account
Chang, Y., Delaney, P. F., & Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2019.1677672 · Cited by 2
“The absence of testing advantages over restudy on an immediate final test in old/new recognition was anticipated for semantically-distinct foils because that effect has been obtained repeatedly (e.g. Carpenter & DeLosh, 2006; Glover, 1989).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNováková, L. M., & Havlíček, J. (2019) · Chemosensory Perception · doi:10.1007/s12078-019-09260-0 · Cited by 3
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Computer-Based Learning Aids
Howe, P., Lodge, J., & McKague, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00051 · Cited by 3
“In the lab-based studies that employed recall-based quizzes, students were required to supply a specific answer, often a specific word or phrase (Bjork and Whitten, 1974; Glover, 1989; Carpenter and DeLosh, 2006; McDaniel et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTheories and Literatures for Technology-Enhanced Language Instruction
Jia, J. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7663-1.ch003 · Cited by 2
Encouraging Metacognition in Digital Learning Environments
Devers, C. J., Devers, E. E., & Oke, L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46215-8_2 · Cited by 4
Yu, Y., Zhao, W., Li, A., Shanks, D. R., Hu, X., Luo, L., & Yang, C. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10024-4 · Cited by 2
“These theories suggest that, similar to overt retrieval (Glover, 1989; Pyc & Rawson, 2009; Rowland, 2014; Yang et al., 2021), covert retrieval enhances learning by reinforcing memory through cognitive effort and re-exposure.”
InfluentialNováková, L. M., & Marková, M. (2024) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114784 · Cited by 2
John Glover: a Long Overdue Account of His Productive Scholarship Methods
Kiewra, K. A., & Kauffman, D. F. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09778-6 · Cited by 2
Investigating the replicability and generalizability of the negative testing effect.
Wissman, K. T., & Peterson, D. J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.05.002 · Cited by 3
The Peril and Promise of Pre-Tests in Informal Massive Open Online Courses
Janelli, M., & Lipnevich, A. (2020) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-5074-8.ch002 · Cited by 2
Using repeated testing and variable encoding to promote transfer of learning
Butler, A. C. (2009) · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · doi:10.7936/k7tq5znx · Cited by 1
“…amount of research (see Marsh et al., 2007; McDaniel, Roediger, et al., 2007; Pashler et al., 2007) and calls for the use of testing as a learning tool in the classroom (e.g., Glover, 1989; Leeming, 2002; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006a) The generalizability of the testing effect is well established.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRetrieval Practice Versus Elaborative Encoding: A Systematic and Meta-analytic Review
Gonçalves, A. D. O., Muniz, B. F. B., & Jaeger, A. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10076-6 · Cited by 1
Productive Educational Psychologists: What You Should Know
Kiewra, K. A. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10065-9 · Cited by 1
Long-term effects of working memory retrieval from prioritized and deprioritized states
Born, F., & Spitzer, B. (2026) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-026-00399-7 · Cited by 3
“50,53), which holds the time between sample presentation and WM test constant.”
Developmental improvements in the ability to benefit from testing across middle childhood
Rodríguez-Gonzalo, S., Arnaez-Telleria, J., & Paz‐Alonso, P. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1501866 · Cited by 1
Zhang, Y., Pi, Z., Xu, K., Pan, Y., & Yang, J. (2024) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874241270536 · Cited by 2
“…format can result in more accurate drawings due to students’ ability to continuously reference their learning materials (Fisher & Harris, 1974; Glover, 1989), this condition may also inhibit the active cognitive process of reconstructing learning content from memory (Karpicke et al., 2014;…”
Lipnevich, A. A., Janelli, M., Park, M. J., Calistro, T., & Eßer, F. J. (2024) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2024.2398513 · Cited by 1
“When information is retrieved from memory, its representation in memory is modified to make it more accessible at a later time (Glover, 1989).”
Memory Skill: The Proceduralization of Declarative Memory Through Retrieval Practice
Racsmány, M., & Szöllősi, Á. (2021) · Language, cognition and mind · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66175-5_25 · Cited by 3
“In other words, test enhances memory performance even when the types of retrieval (e.g., free recall, cued recall, recognition) differ between practice and the final test (e.g., Glover, 1989; Kang, McDermott, & Roediger, 2007; Karpicke & Blunt, 2011).”
Result‘Test–enhanced learning’ by Closed book examination followed by feedback in Biochemistry
Bobby, Z., Nandeesha, H., Thippeswamy, D. N., Archana, N., Prerna, S., & Balasubramanian, A. (2018) · South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.4038/seajme.v12i2.48 · Cited by 1
“Several researches have proven that taking an assessment promotes improved retention than re-studying the material for an equivalent duration (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006; A. Glover, 1989).”
BackgroundThe importance of re-learning after retrieval induction in a paired-associate task
Park, J., & Bae, J. S. (2011) · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 · doi:10.22172/cogbio.2011.23.4.006 · Cited by 1
Effects of Learning English Maxim through M-Learning with Different Content Representation
Chen, C.-J., & Liu, P.-L. (2011) · International Conference on E-learning and Games · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23456-9_65 · Cited by 1
Implications of Cognitive Theories for Optimizing Higher Education Learning
Özçelik, E. (2020) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4036-7.ch003 · Cited by 1
Ramgopal, V., Fastrich, G. M., Higham, P. A., Modirrousta-Galian, A., Pattni, M., Potts, R., & Seabrooke, T. (2026) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2026.2733327
“…and retrieval practice, respectively), a smaller body of evidence has shown that combining them is a particularly effective learning strategy (Carpenter & DeLosh, 2005; Glover, 1989, Experiment 3; Higham et al., 2023; Thios & D’Agostino, 1976; see Latimier et al., 2021 for a meta-analysis).”
Liu, S., Huang, S., Han, J., Wang, X., Long, S., & Cao, H.-W. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16081438
“…the distribution‑ based bifurcation model, and episodic context theory (E. L. Bjork & Bjork, 2011; R. A. Bjork, 1994; R. A. Bjork & Bjork, 1992; Glover, 1989; Halamish & Bjork, 2011; Howard & Kahana, 2002; Karpicke & Roediger, 2007; Kornell et al., 2011; Lehman & Malmberg, 2013; Pyc & Rawson,…”
Trends in testing effect research: from lab to classroom, but not yet for all learners
Wilschut, T., Sense, F., & van Rijn, H. (2026) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-026-00400-2
“1 – 4].”
Goldstein, H., Rau, L.-M., Bachhausen, V., & Wager, J. (2025) · Children · doi:10.3390/children12060716
“Headache-specific knowledge was not part of T3 to minimize testing effects [24,25] and participant burden.”
The effect of social retelling on event recall
Harris, K., & McDermott, K. (2024) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2024.2415907
“That is, prior retrieval practice tends to enhance later memory relative to a condition in which no initial retrieval practice takes place (the testing effect, Glover, 1989; Roediger & Karpicke, 2006; see McDer-mott, 2021 for review).”
Prediction Levels of Teacher-Made Tests: A Case of Ordinary Level Geography in Highfield, Zimbabwe
Edmore, M., Taruvinga, M. D., & Hamilton, M. (2016) · doi:10.2121/atikan-journal.v3i1.140.g139
“For example, R. Hoste (1981) in Britain and S.A. Glover (1989) in Indiana found that teacher-made tests accurately predicted pupil performance in final “O” level examinations.”
BackgroundMetacognitive Judgments and Actual Utilization of Women College Students' Learning Strategies
임정만, & 배제성 (2012) · Asian Journal of Education · doi:10.15753/aje.2012.13.4.015 · Cited by 1
The Effect of Overt/Covert Unsuccessful Retrieval upon Subsequent Learning
서, 혜., Park, J., & 남, 서. (2012) · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 · doi:10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.3.001
Considerations when designing educational experiences
Woolliscroft, J. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819620-5.00019-9
The Use of Narrative Framework in Learning L2 Vocabulary Among Malaysian ESL Learners
Yusob, K. F., Jelani, A., Ismail, I. N. B., & Baudin, N. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-1458-1_80
New Approaches to Assessment That Move in the Right Direction
Gordon, E. W., & Rajagopalan, K. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137519962_6 · Cited by 2
Sosic-Vasic, Z., & Kornmeier, J. (2011) · Nervenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1628402
Metadata
- Authors
- Glover, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Ball State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glover, John A.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 392-399
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2073855993
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- testing effect, retrieval practice, memory retention, student memories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review