The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: Gender similarities and differences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, results from a meta-analysis suggest that, on average, males outperform females on visual-spatial tasks starting as early as 3 years of age, suggesting that boys ' advantage in this area is not due to differences in life experience alone (Cohen ' s d ¼ 0.37; Robinson et al., 1996; Voyer et al., 1995).”
From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Robinson et al., 1996
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
School readiness and later achievement.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., et al. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 · Cited by 5,439
The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x · Cited by 1,206
Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014412 · Cited by 957
New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021276 · Cited by 920
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x · Cited by 603
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Busse, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 341-352
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W4253477385
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 14.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- mathematical ability, gender differences, gender similarity, ability structure, early mathematics achievement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
