The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency.
Abstract
This study examined the common and distinct contributions of context-free and context reading skill to reading comprehension and the contributions of context-free reading skill and reading comprehension to context fluency. The 113 4th-grade participants were measured in reading comprehension, read aloud a folktale, and read aloud the folktale's words in a random list. Fluency was scaled as speed (words read correctly in 1 min) and time (seconds per correct word). Relative to list fluency, context fluency was a stronger predictor of comprehension. List fluency and comprehension each uniquely predicted context fluency, but their relative contributions depended on how fluency was scaled (time or speed). Results support the conclusion that word level processes contribute relatively more to fluency at lower levels while comprehension contributes relatively more at higher levels. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,847
Casella, G., & Berger, R. (2024) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003456285 · Cited by 5,711
Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children
(1998) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/6023 · Cited by 5,337
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,363
Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading
Barnett, M. A., Singer, H., & Ruddell, R. B. (1987) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326762 · Cited by 3,086
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf00401799 · Cited by 2,956
Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium
Brown, A. S., & Solso, R. L. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421430 · Cited by 2,382
Attention And Cognitive Control 1
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (2024) · Information Processing and Cognition · doi:10.4324/9781032722450-4 · Cited by 2,264
Kintsch, W. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,049
Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.
Juel, C. (1988) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437 · Cited by 1,925
Cited by
Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement
Deno, S. L. (2003) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/00224669030370030801 · Cited by 653
Self-citationQuinn, J. M., & Wagner, R. K. (2015) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219413508323 · Cited by 172
Toward Integrative Reading Science: The Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Reading
Kim, Y.-S. G. (2020) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219420908239 · Cited by 166
Duncan, L. G., McGeown, S. P., Griffiths, Y. M., Stothard, S. E., & Dobai, A. (2016) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12134 · Cited by 105
Reading fluency: Implications for the assessment of children with reading disabilities
Meisinger, E. B., Bloom, J. S., & Hynd, G. W. (2010) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0031-z · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 719-729
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2022848219
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719
- The paper
- Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
