Cited by 1,925Reading and Literacy DevelopmentWriting and Handwriting EducationLiteracy and Educational Practices

Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.

Juel, Connie·1988·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

My research focused on literacy development in children through fourth grade and followed an earlier study (Juel, Griffith, & Gough, 1986

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juel, C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Juel, Connie
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1988-12
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
437-447
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2061693824
Cited by
1,925
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 96
FWCI
16.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
Keywords
literacy development, reading acquisition, writing development, early literacy, longitudinal study of children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review