Cited by 247Deception detection and forensic psychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Effects of nonverbal dissimulation on emotional experience and autonomic arousal.

Lanzetta, John T., Cartwright-Smith, Jeffrey, Eleck, Robert E.·1976·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three studies are reported that examine the relationship between the nonverbal display of emotional affect and indices of the emotional state. Subjects were asked either to conceal or to exaggerate the facial display associated with the anticipation and reception of painful shocks that varied in intensity. Both self-reports of shock painfulness and skin conductance measures of emotional response showed significant changes paralleling the changes induced in expressive behavior; that is, the suppression of expressive responses decreased the magnitude of phasic skin conductance changes and subjective reports of painfulness as compared to the free expression or exaggeration of pain-related expressive response. The effects were obtained for shocks of varying intensities and for both male and female subjects. The findings support theories of emotion that assume that expressive responses serve a self-regulatory as well as a social-communicative function, and further suggest that the self-regulation is mediated neurally, rather than via a process of self-attribution. Finally, the results highlight the need for research on dissimulation in social interaction to consider the effects of acting upon the actor, as well as its effects upon the inferences of observers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.33.3.354

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies that found no sex difference in expression also found no difference in reports of experienced emotion.

    “some studies that have found no sex difference in expression also found no difference in reports of experienced emotion (Cupchik & Poulos, 1984; Lanzetta et al., 1976).”

    From Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. (1998) · cites this paper as Lanzetta et al., 1976

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanzetta, J. T., Cartwright-Smith, J., & Eleck, R. E.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1976
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
354-370
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2056152185
Cited by
247
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
dissimulation, nonverbal expression, facial expressions, pain, emotion regulation, skin conductance, autonomic arousal, emotional experience, concealment of emotions, self-attribution
MeSH terms
Arousal, Electroshock, Emotions, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Pain, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review