Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion.

Abstract

In a field setting, physically attractive or unattractive male and female com-municator-subjects delivered a persuasive message to target-subjects of each sex. Results indicated that attractive (vs. unattractive) communicators induced significantly greater persuasion on both a verbal and behavioral measure of target agreement. In addition, female targets indicated greater agreement than did male targets. Data gathered from communicator-subjects during an earlier laboratory session indicated that physically attractive and unattractive com-municators differed with respect to several communication skills and other attributes relevant to communicator persuasiveness, including grade point av-erage, Scholastic Aptitude Test scores, and several measures of self-evaluation. These findings suggest that attractive individuals may be more persuasive than unattractive persons partly because they possess characteristics that dispose them to be more effective communicators. Experimental evidence regarding the effect of communicator physical attractiveness on persuasion is equivocal. Although two studies have demonstrated that attractiveness can significantly enhance a male communicator's persuasiveness with both male and female message recipients (Horai, Naccari, & Fatoul-lah, 1974; Snyder & Rothbart, 1971), the majority of published experiments have failed to obtain significant attractiveness effects or have obtained interactions between attractive-ness and other variables (Chaiken, Eagly,

Cites (1)

1. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
   Rotter, Julian B. · 1966 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied

Show all 1 references

Cited by (18)

1. Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers' Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness
   Ohanian, Roobina · 1990 · Journal of Advertising
2. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
   Langlois, Judith H., Kalakanis, Lisa, Rubenstein, Adam J., Larson, Andrea, Hallam, Monica, Smoot, Monica · 2000 · Psychological Bulletin
3. What is beautiful is good, but . . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype.
   Eagly, Alice H., Ashmore, Richard D., Makhijani, Mona G., Longo, Laura C. · 1991 · Psychological Bulletin
4. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions
   Sokolova, Karina, Kefi, Hajer · 2020 · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
5. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do
   Fogg, B. J. · 2002 · Ubiquity

See all 610